Which statement most clearly links the evidence and conclusion for an argument in favor of requiring school uniforms? A) When so
cio-economic distinctions are eliminated, school uniforms should be required for use by all students. B) As a result of socio-economic distinctions being minimized among students, school uniforms should be required. C) School uniforms help minimize socio-economic distinctions between students, but they should be required of all students. D) School uniforms should be required because they eliminate socio-economic distinctions between students of varying backgrounds.
The correct answer is option D: School uniforms should be required because they eliminate socio-economic distinctions between students of varying backgrounds.
The grammar and overall syntax of the previous three statements is somewhat convoluted.
Option A leaves open the day that uniforms should be required until socio-economic distinctions are eliminated. An uncertain day that may never come.
Option B makes it sound like the obligation of wearing uniforms comes as a result of 'socio-economic distinctions being minimized.
Option C is phrased awkwardly although its sentences are correct.
To bend you change the shape but when you break you split it in half or tear it. For example you can bend foil or a gum wrapper and its shape changes, but you can rip or tear the foil or gum wrapper breaking it.
