Which statement most clearly links the evidence and conclusion for an argument in favor of requiring school uniforms? A) When so
cio-economic distinctions are eliminated, school uniforms should be required for use by all students. B) As a result of socio-economic distinctions being minimized among students, school uniforms should be required. C) School uniforms help minimize socio-economic distinctions between students, but they should be required of all students. D) School uniforms should be required because they eliminate socio-economic distinctions between students of varying backgrounds.
The correct answer is option D: School uniforms should be required because they eliminate socio-economic distinctions between students of varying backgrounds.
The grammar and overall syntax of the previous three statements is somewhat convoluted.
Option A leaves open the day that uniforms should be required until socio-economic distinctions are eliminated. An uncertain day that may never come.
Option B makes it sound like the obligation of wearing uniforms comes as a result of 'socio-economic distinctions being minimized.
Option C is phrased awkwardly although its sentences are correct.
<h2>Only the excerpt tells about the atmosphere in the room after Iqbal received the award.
</h2>
Explanation:
<h3><em><u>Later that year he arrived in Boston to receive the Reebok Youth in Action Award.
</u></em></h3><h3><em><u>Holding a pencil in one hand and a carpet tool in the other, Iqbal stood before the audience. And in his small but commanding voice he spoke of the horrors of child labour. The room was intensely silent.
</u></em></h3>
Simple. I assume the ones going to the middle school are currently in 5th grade at the elementary school. You have 126 coming into the middle school from each school. You need to multiply 126 by 4. You get 504. There will be 504 new students at the middle school.
