The environment of the New England colonies did not affect the development of slavery in this region. It did not affect the development of slavery because New England soil was not good for farming. Most slaves were used for farming, but since nobody owned a farm in this region, there was little need for slaves, period. Most of the New England region was industries and since the slaves would have to be taught how to do the job, the factory owners pretty much saw no purpose in even using slaves. Don't get me wrong, there may have been some parts of this region that WAS used for farming, but if there were any, it wasn't an abundant amount of them.
I hope this helps you out! Let me know if you need help with anything else! :)
One way in which you can show responsiveness to the public as a public employee is to really listen to their wants and address their issues head-on.
Answer:
its sutras dharma and enlightenment
Explanation:
trust me if its right pls give me brianliest
Answer:
Explanation:Roediger and Karpicke (2006) investigated whether the test-enhanced learning effect (the demonstration that repeated testing improves memory for material) was due merely to repeated exposure to material. They randomly assigned participants to one of two study conditions (study-study or study-test) and to one of three retention interval conditions (final test at a delay of 5 minutes, 2 days, or 1 week). The dependent variable was the proportion of idea units recalled from an encyclopedia passage. How would you label the analysis for these data?A. 2 × 2 within-groups ANOVAB. 2 × 3 within-groups ANOVAC. 2 × 3 between-groups ANOVAD. 4 × 2 between-groups ANOVA
Answer:
Explanation:
