Answer: becoming a disciple of Christ
Answer:
It is not reasonable to say there is a correlation because it is categorical data. However if it was quantitative data, correlation doesn’t always mean causation, because there might be athird variable (lurking variable) that may have a better explanation for the correlation.
Explanation:
Is it not reasonable to say that there's a correlation between the type of car you own and the risk that it will be stolen because it is categorical data. However if it was quantitative data, correlation doesn’t always mean causation, because there might be a third variable that may have a better explanation for the correlation and it might as well means that the third-lurking variable affects the correlation; for example, those cars that are most frequently reported stolen may simply be the cars that are more commonly sold because they are cheaper than the cars that are stolen least often, and thus have a higher chance of being exposed to thieves.
Hello,
Here is your answer:
The proper answer to this question is option C "<span> it has the power to enforce the law". Judicial Branch is suppose to take care or punish anyone who breaks the law.
Your answer is C.
If you need anymore help feel free to ask me!
Hope this helps!</span>
Answer: <u><em>The given statement is false</em></u>, since "positivism" paradigm that presumes that nature can be studied and comprehended in a logical, scientific manner; stresses objectivity, exactness, and generalization.
Therefore, the following statement; "According to Babbie, one critical review of "positivism" in dismal science research is that individual may not be able to be as verifiable as the knowledge domain ideal presume." is false.