$1.12 is what i got from dividing $11.20 by 10
Hello. You did not say what text this question refers to, which makes it impossible for your question to be answered efficiently and specifically. However, to try to help you, I will show you what an argument is and how are the rhetorical appeals that can be used in one. This can guide you in finding the correct answer.
An argument is a position on a theme, where the author demonstrates what he thinks about something or how he understands how such things happen. In addition to presenting a position, the argument presents evidence that provides veracity to the position, showing how it is real and relevant.
To enhance the argument and make it more powerful, rhetorical appeals can be used. These appeals are ethos (which refers to ethics), logos (which refers to logic) and pathos (which refers to emotions and feelings), which are used in sentences to strengthen an important point of the argument and to converge the audience.
Read the excerpt from the US Supreme court case Plessy v. Ferguson (1896).
The statute of Louisiana, acts of 1890, c. 111, requiring railway companies carrying passengers in their coaches in that State, to provide equal, but separate, accommodations for the white and colored races, by providing two or more passenger coaches for each passenger train, or by dividing the passenger coaches by a partition so as to secure separate accommodations; and providing that no person shall be permitted to occupy seats in coaches other than the ones assigned to them, on account of the race they belong to; and requiring the officer of the passenger train to assign each passenger to the coach or compartment assigned for the race to which he or she belong; and imposing fines or imprisonment upon passengers insisting on going into a coach or compartment other than the one set aide for the race to which he or she belongs; and conferring upon officers of the train power to refuse to carry on the train passengers refusing to occupy the coach or compartment assigned to them, and exempting the railway company from liability for such refusal, are not in conflict with the provisions either of the Thirteenth Amendment or of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
Which best explains why the Supreme Court’s decision in Plessy v. Ferguson was unconstitutional?
Answer:
Explanation:
This is a really tricky question to be honest. I believe the answer will be 'has grown' as:
- Among the given options it won't be 'have grown' as have is used for plural subjects (except for 'you' and 'I'). Here, the subject will be the 'seed of revolution' which is in singular form.
- Now, there's 'has been grown'. This could be right but remember that the term 'seed of revolution' doesn't refer to the normal plant seeds but it signifies how people came to have the seed embeded within themselves and the intelligence to fight for their rights, thus starting a revolution. No one artificially grew this seed for it to 'have been' grown; it just grew naturally in the minds of the civillians.
- Hence, 'has grown' seems to be the most apt answer.
Please do let me know if this is wrong or right. Thanks!
Answer:
The question is asking for which poem you should use different voices to read them.
Explanation:
Not if you need to use a different voice for each poem, because you do. It's asking for which singular poem uses more than one voice to read.
