Answer: Consideration of American responses to Nazism during the 1930s and 1940s raises questions about the responsibility to intervene in response to persecution or genocide in another country. As soon as Hitler assumed power in 1933, Americans had access to information about Nazi Germany’s persecution of Jews and other groups. Although some Americans protested Nazism, there was no sustained, nationwide effort in the United States to oppose the Nazi treatment of Jews. Even after the US entered World War II, the government did not make the rescue of Jews a major war aim. (I think this is it i dont know im pretty sure)
1. The League of Nations lacked enforcement power. It did not have an army or navy at its disposal.
2. All of the answers are possible reasons for appeasement
3. The United States and The Soviet Union.
Answer:
It all began when the Romans overthrew their Etruscan conquerors in 509 B.C.E. ... Centered north of Rome, the Etruscans had ruled over the Romans for hundreds of years. Once free, the Romans established a republic, a government in which citizens elected representatives to rule on their behalf.
Explanation:
Answer:
See the explanation below.
Explanation:
According to me, if we use Military history to learn about leadership and study the commander's mind then it will be the more constructive approach towards the subject. We can keep our focus on military affairs which have large impact on our society.
Military history as a discipline record the armed conflict in the history of humanity and tries to assess it's impact over economies, societies, culture, etc. which in result lead to changes or development in local and international affairs. It also help us to study about military strategy adopted by each side and help in assessing how these tactics and technologies have changed with time, for example, it tries to explain that how warfare led to the development of weapon and with time how emerging technologies have shaped these weapons.
A Supreme Court ruling made the posting in each classroom in a public school of Ten Commandments as unconstitutional Stone V. Graham.
It was called unconstitutional because it does not have any religious purpose. The court argued that it is a part of the curriculum. Furthermore, it's against the Establishment Clause.
