1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ulleksa [173]
3 years ago
15

2. How might you approach military history in a more constructive manner?

History
1 answer:
avanturin [10]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

See the explanation below.

Explanation:

According to me, if we use Military history to learn about leadership and study the commander's mind then it will be the more constructive approach towards the subject. We can keep our focus on military affairs which have large impact on our society.

Military history as a discipline record the armed conflict in the history of humanity and tries to assess it's impact over economies, societies, culture, etc. which in result lead to changes or development in local and international affairs. It also help us to study about military strategy adopted by each side and help in assessing how these tactics and technologies have changed with time, for example, it tries to explain that how warfare led to the development of weapon and with time how emerging technologies have shaped these weapons.

You might be interested in
Which two countries allied to invade Poland
MaRussiya [10]

Soviet Union and Germany

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of these descriptions would fit both Paleo- and Archaic Indian cultures?Choose all that apply
Masja [62]
The Answer is D because I said ao
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
While some historians explain the end of slavery in the americas throughout the nineteenth century as a response to the antislav
SVETLANKA909090 [29]
Britain needed to resolve a conflict between the principles of free trade (which Britain was more and more adopting) and the institution of slavery.

Concerns about slave revolts indeed were indeed part of Britain's pragmatic decisions to end its participation in the slave trade in 1807 and phasing out slavery in its empire starting in 1834.  But the other factor was that the Industrial Revolution was taking over how the British economy operated, and the institution of slavery no longer fit within the new, industrializing economy.  

Along with those practical reasons, there was of course much moral pressure applied by the abolitionist movement.  William Wilberforce was a key voice of conscience in Parliament from the moral side of the argument.
6 0
3 years ago
In which century did both Germany and Italy achieve unification
vova2212 [387]
They achieved unification in the 19th century!
7 0
4 years ago
During the neolithic revolution, what did the production of food surplus lead to?
GuDViN [60]
The surplus of food lead to everything you see today all because people could settle down and make towns then civilizations and eventually empires

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the main goal of the United Nations?
    15·2 answers
  • 4. Which tactical mistake by Santa Anna gave the Texans a major geographic advantage just before Sam Houston had his men begin t
    14·1 answer
  • Whose goals does this declaration represent?
    12·1 answer
  • The Soviet blockade of West Berlin in 1948 was designed to prevent
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following dates and statements are both accurate and reflect an important step in the European conquest and settlem
    9·2 answers
  • Did the flatiron building have an elevator?
    12·1 answer
  • Human rights groups in the 20th century worked to:
    8·1 answer
  • Is it just me or did we get blocked for a month from brainly cause it said I was blocked from this site for now.... Did it happe
    9·2 answers
  • What was the goal of the explorer Juan pardo
    13·1 answer
  • What was the reaction of the southerners when charles sumner was hit with a cane ​
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!