Answer:
I think it's C
Explanation:
A - The claim doesn't address the why
But the thesis statement does address the why. It answers why:
WHY is there images happy children used for the "Healthy Choices" menu?
BECAUSE the restaurant chain is trying to draw attention away from its role in depleting the rain forest.
B - The student didn't use analysis to reach the claim
The students did analyze the image
C - The student didn't address the "so what?" question
The student does not give a follow up reasoning to why this matters. The student only tells us that the restaurant is trying to draw attention away from it's role in depleting the rain forest. The student doesn't tell us: Why should we care? You may think this is common sense, of course we care about the rain forest! But the thesis does not tell us this.
D - The claim isn't reasoned
They tell us the claim, and reasoning in this sentence: "...features images of happy children playing in neatly manicured parks because the restaurant chain is trying to draw attention away from its role in depleting the rain forest."
C makes the most sense as your answer, although my second guess would be D, english can be tricky.
Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) generally are minimum amounts that a retirement plan account owner must withdraw annually starting with the year that he or she reaches 72 (70 ½ if you reach 70 ½ before January 1, 2020). mark me brainiest please
its because they want more and more, their never happy of what they have if they have 2 cars they'll want 5 if they have 5 cars they'll want 10. its in the mind of people that money is everything the price of happiness. celebrity's have so much money they could afford their own island but they end up being sad or depressed and kill themselves. for what? cuz they weren't happy and despite all the money they had. people want to make more money as to live a luxurious life to fulfill their goals in life (which is nothing wrong with that) cuz their not happy of what they have, im not saying its bad to make more money of course its ok but some people go to far with it even if they have everything they still want more. its like a saying stuck in their mind "the more money i have ; the better my life will be".
Answer:
B. To introduce a family that personalizes the plight of the peasantry
Explanation:
The answer would be "B," because even just glancing at the title of the story, you can tell that only answer "B," makes sense. It's on how a family in Russia is having to survive on their own.
Answer:
what is the question I cannot understand it
