Answer: It Really Means One Anglo and One Mexican...
Explanation:
When Anglo growers welcomed Chicano workers in their fields during times of economic prosperity, they shut them out of mainstream society.
It can. The mexican-american war also dealt with the future of the territories that were involved like the Texas territory. Since the United States won the territories from Mexico, the new colonies wanted to be slave colonies, and the general government disliked this. There would've been fewer slave colonies if they hadn't been conquered.
The correct answer is B, since that diagram best explains a cause and effect relationship that has shaped U.S. politics. In fact, restrictions on who can receive public campaign funds have contributed to the persistence of the two-party system.
Public funding of political campaigns in the United States is quite limited, so candidates end up going to private financing. This, in turn, only finances those who have real chances of getting the positions in the voting, which ends up closing the question between Democrats and Republicans, strengthening the two-party system.
San Antonio was the seat of power for the Tejas area. Even though, Texas was not an individual state (it was part of the larger state of Coahuila y Tejas) it still had and did many of the things that other states did. THE size and population of Texas demanded that it have a more local regional government than the one located hundreds of miles away in Coahuila. The city became even more sought after during the Revolution. Santa Anna thought that taking San Antonio would help to squash the rebellion. However the Battle of the Alamo became an inspiration for the Texians and Tejanos fighting for freedom.
Answer:
65 because the were more important than others
Explanation:
second question is C
