Answer:
In our view, when individuals act despite knowing the threat from their acts to the survival and well-being of ecosystems and future generations – for example, from economic activities or from regulatory approval of such activities, which gravely or irreparably imperil the conditions of survival of a given ecosystem – this should constitute a crime against future generations.
I believe it's B because popular sovereignty deals with the government receiving its power from the government and people have the right to speak up and disagree
Answer:
*It should be Denmark Vesey not Denmark Veset*
He was accused and convicted of being the leader of "the rising," a potentially major slave revolt which was scheduled to take place in the city on July 14, as well as mounting a planned insurrection where slaves would rise in the middle of the night, murder their masters by slitting their throats, burn the city, and then mount their escape by sailing from the harbor in Charleston to the black republic of Haiti.
The Jet Stream hope it helps
