1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bonufazy [111]
2 years ago
7

Describe at least two reasons for English exploration and colonization in North America.

History
2 answers:
Soloha48 [4]2 years ago
4 0

Explore new food and material source. Conquest.

Radda [10]2 years ago
4 0
God, Glory, and Wealth. God, to spread Christianity,and to learn what other religions were out there. Glory, to be the first to find new land, new trade routes, and new space. Wealth, monopolize the trade industry all over the word and to cut out the middle man to make all profit
You might be interested in
To what extent has the United States fulfilled its promise of liberty, justice, and equality for all?
Effectus [21]

Answer:

Making the Constitution?

8 0
3 years ago
What was The main contribution of the Austrians in the time period from 1500 to 1800 was:
Daniel [21]
The halting of the advances of the ottoman Turks.
3 0
3 years ago
Please help due tomorrow.
enot [183]
Can not get on the attachment can you give a hint of what I can do to help?
4 0
3 years ago
What 3 major events in England in the 16th century brought about an atmosphere for a great period of literature
Olin [163]

Answer:

The Religious/Political Climate of 16th Century England. At the end of the Wars of Roses, Henry Tudor ascended to the throne (as Henry the VII) and until the civil war in 1642, the reign of the house of Tudor was generally a peaceful one. After the death of Henry VII the throne was passed to Henry VIII in 1509.

Explanation:

some of the answers are in that paragraph.

4 0
2 years ago
What are large groups within Christianity that share certain beliefs and rituals but disagree on others?
ratelena [41]

Answer:The domain of religious inquiry is characterized by pervasive and seemingly intractable disagreement. Whatever stance one takes on central religious questions—for example, whether God exists, what the nature of God might be, whether the world has a purpose, whether there is life beyond death—one will stand opposed to a large contingent of highly informed and intelligent thinkers. The fact of extensive religious disagreement raises several distinct philosophical questions. One significant question arises within the context of political philosophy: may religious conceptions of the good and the right legitimately ground one’s political convictions in a pluralistic society marked by diverse and often conflicting religious convictions? Other questions concern the possibility of reconciling disagreement data with specific religious beliefs. For example, can persistent religious disagreement be squared with the conviction of many Christians and other theists that God “desires everyone to be saved and to come to knowledge of the truth” (I Timothy 2:4, NRSV)? These and other important questions will not be taken up here. The focus of this article is the epistemic challenge raised by religious disagreement: does awareness of the nature and extent of religious disagreement make it unreasonable to hold confident religious, or explicitly irreligious, views? Many philosophers have answered this question in the affirmative, arguing that the proper response to religious disagreement is religious skepticism. Others contend that religious conviction may be reasonably maintained even in the face of disagreement with highly qualified thinkers.

Reflecting on the epistemic challenge posed by religious disagreement readily leads one to questions concerning the epistemic significance of disagreement in general, religious or otherwise. One might think that religious disagreement does not raise any distinctive epistemological questions beyond those that are addressed in a more general work on disagreement. There are, however, features of religious disagreements that present problems that, for the most part, are not adequately addressed in such a work. These features include the lack of agreement on what skills, virtues, and qualifications are most important for assessing the questions under dispute; the fact that many of the disputed beliefs are arguably epistemically fundamental; the significant evidential weight that is assigned to private experiences; and the prominence of practical or pragmatic considerations in the justifications offered for opposing viewpoints. While these features taken individually may not be exclusive to religious disagreements, the fact that they frequently coincide in religious disputes and are especially salient in such disputes makes religious disagreement a worthy epistemological topic in its own right. The bulk of this article will focus on these problematic features of religious disagreements and the special questions they raise.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • two advancements that wealth brought to ancient Egypt, and explain what impact these advancements had on the culture.
    13·1 answer
  • Before 1945 Vietnam was controlled by what country? *
    11·1 answer
  • Hi everyone how are you
    12·2 answers
  • The point of maxmum profit is the point at which the marginal cost equals the
    15·1 answer
  • Select the types of information that the Gospel writers used to help Gentile readers understand their story Specific locations o
    13·1 answer
  • What was the nation governments biggest concern in facing a war, under the articles of confederation?
    8·1 answer
  • After the Holy Roman Emperor, Charles V, banned the printing and selling of Luther’s works, what did Luther do?
    10·1 answer
  • 3 interesting facts about the nazi party
    12·1 answer
  • What was this undeclared' war called?
    11·1 answer
  • What was the race for territory and influence on the African continent called?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!