1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marta [7]
3 years ago
10

What kind of student was charles darwin? in what subject was he notably deficient?

History
1 answer:
spin [16.1K]3 years ago
4 0
Charles Darwin was not the best student - he gave up on many of the things he wanted to do for a career, including medicene, becoming a minister, and many other roles. He eventually settled down with botany, the study of plants, and got a bachelor's degree.

Hope this helps!
You might be interested in
Who became king of France after Napoleon was exiled?
zalisa [80]
Louis XVIII became the King of France after Napoleon was exiled.
4 0
3 years ago
What role do you think consumers and businesses play in determining the prices of goods?
Maurinko [17]
Businesses use product placements for attraction. See, they want to drag in customers so that they use their money to the best of their ability. So they can get the best out of the product that the business is offering. The business gives a product, the customers buy.
4 0
3 years ago
If you get it correct I’ll mark you as brainlist:)
AVprozaik [17]

Answer:

a type of government whose power is defined and limited by law

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
6. How can students in America help, according to Murekatete?
Lostsunrise [7]

Answer:

b. Educate themselves so this doesn't happen again

Explanation:

Ms. Murekatete shows listener about the negative impact of racial hatred and that people are taught hatred and hatred needs to be stopped. She says that the only way that students can help to stop this hatred is to be educated so that is does not continue to happen. He explains about two people who lost their family to genocide.

3 0
3 years ago
Compare and contrast Hobbes’ and Locke’s views of human nature and the role government should play
svet-max [94.6K]

Thomas Hobbes believed that people were inherently suspicious of one another and in competition with one another.  This led him to propose that government should have supreme authority over people in order to maintain security and a stable society.

John Locke argued that people were born as blank slates, open to learning all things by experience.  Ultimately this meant Locke viewed human beings in a mostly positive way, and so his approach to government was to keep the people empowered to establish and regulate their own governments for the sake of building good societies.

Further explanation:

Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people.  But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.

Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan</em>  in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War.  He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and evil toward one another as a result.  Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.

John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government</em> in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England.  Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings.  Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.

In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way.  If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way.   Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved.    Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith.  But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke.   :-)

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • UU.<br>S. In 1992, how many times had the Constitution been<br>amended?​
    13·1 answer
  • What are the requirements in the constitution for becoming a senator ​
    8·1 answer
  • What can you infer about macbeths character from his hesitation to murder the king
    10·2 answers
  • 1. ¿Qué proponen los freegans?
    6·1 answer
  • Why was the Mongol’s invasion’s effect on Hungary different from the invasion’s effect on Russia?
    15·1 answer
  • Who is known for creating a written language for the cherokee?
    10·1 answer
  • Why are judges different from federal officials
    7·1 answer
  • What event triggered Austria-Hungary's declaration of war on Serbia?
    11·1 answer
  • Due in 20 minutes plz help
    13·1 answer
  • Who is your fav anime character from the show my hero academia
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!