Answer:
Anza was asked to stop the Indian raids by winning over the Comanche, then make an alliance with the Comanche so they could make mutual war on the Apaches.
Explanation:
:(:
C is the answer pioneer movement will be the answer for mini reform movement sprung up in the 1800
The National Security Strategy states that "deterrence based only upon the threat of retaliation is less likely to work against leaders of rogue states, is the true statement.
<h3>What is deterrence?</h3>
This is a security measure that is employed to demonstrate the strength and capability of a nation or individual in order to deter other attackers due to the possibility of reprisal.
Deterrence is effective, as can be seen, however relying too much on it against rogue governments based on the threat of reprisal may not be the best strategy.
Thus, it is a true statement.
For more information about Deterrence, click here:
brainly.com/question/28006908
#SPJ1
Answer:
The Twelfth Amendment to the Constitution, adopted in 1804, required the Electoral College to vote separately for president and vicepresident.
Until then, the Electoral College indirectly elected the vice president of the United States: while the president obtained the majority of the electoral votes, the candidate who finished second acceded to the vice presidency. Thus, political disputes were generated because many times it could happen that these candidates did not have similar political plans, or even didn't belong to the same party. With the approval of this Amendment, the vice president moved to integrate the presidential ballot, with which the voters had to start choosing candidates for both positions, and not only for the presidency.
The election of 1848 did nothing to quell the controversy over whether slavery would advance into the Mexican Cession. Some slaveholders, like President Taylor, considered the question a moot point because the lands acquired from Mexico were far too dry for growing cotton and therefore, they thought, no slaveholder would want to move there. Other southerners, however, argued that the question was not whether slaveholders would want to move to the lands of the Mexican Cession, but whether they could and still retain control of their slave property. Denying them the right to freely relocate with their lawful property was, they maintained, unfair and unconstitutional. Northerners argued, just as fervidly, that because Mexico had abolished slavery, no slaves currently lived in the Mexican Cession, and to introduce slavery there would extend it to a new territory, thus furthering the institution and giving the Slave Power more control over the United States. The strong current of antislavery sentiment—that is, the desire to protect white labor—only increased the opposition to the expansion of slavery into the West.
