I assume your talking about the HUNS... When the empire split in two the east had more gold and more resources and the dying west had to suffer all the barbarian attacks like the huns... The East quite simply was more prepared and had more walls and guards to defend their border also the Eastern Empire had the river danube north of them which helped deflect the Hunnic invasions and other barbarian invasion more west...
<span>The Freedom permanent still effects us today in many different ways. A couple examples the New Freedom still has a huge impact on Americans today is the Federal income tax, the election of senators, and the Federal Trade Commission. There have been some changes to these over the years but they still have their original purpose in today's society.</span>
Of all the option given about the dollar diplomacy of United States, the correct answer is “U.S. Dollar Diplomacy in Latin America was often accompanied by military intervention”.
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The Dollar Diplomacy of United States was all about foreign policy which aided for the creation of stability promoting the American interest in commerce over the globe through China and West Africa.
But the foreign policy was intervened with military intervention accompanying to the Latin America. The dollar diplomacy failed to create the stability in commercial interest with the failure of aim to abandon the military intervention from the Latin America in due course of revolutionary times.
I'm assuming the Israelites, and because they were being treated badly. your question is confusing?<span />
Answer:
The Knights of Labor
Explanation:
The Knights of Labor was an active American labor federation in the late 19th century, especially in the 1880s. It operated in the United States, as well as in Canada, and also had great participation in Great Britain and Australia. The organization considered its task to be the education of the workers, the defense of their interests through solidarity and mutual aid among the workers. However, the Order's leadership ultimately rejected the workers' participation in the political struggle and had positions of class collaboration.
