1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tamiku [17]
3 years ago
10

Plz Help Me I will mark brainliest!

History
2 answers:
OLEGan [10]3 years ago
5 0
I believe it is communism although I am not certain. If I wrong sue me for 6 sextillion atoms. 
arlik [135]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: Communism.

Explanation:

Communism is a political and economic theory that proposes the replacement of private property and a profit-based market with government control and communal administration of the main means of production. In communism, the government owns all the factors of production:  labor, entrepreneurship, capital goods, and natural resources.

You might be interested in
Which action was unique about the 2008 presidential election?
777dan777 [17]

Answer:

I think it would be 1.

Explanation:

Because Hillary Clinton ran for president but got beaten by Barack Obama

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
New political structures grew as kings relied less on the nobility and more on
victus00 [196]
OK my friend so basically new political structures grew because they relied on the help of wealth and mercenaries 
3 0
3 years ago
Why do historians needs to be careful about being unbiased when presenting historical information
kap26 [50]

Answer:

Explanation:

The problem is they don't. One day you will take a history class that talks about Hiroshima or the Holocaust. They were both tragedies of a kind that is almost impossible to record with no bias.

But what would happen if you read the history from another point of view. Suppose, which I don't think has been done in any school in North America, you were to read about Hiroshima from the point of view of the Japanese. What have they said about it? What will they teach their children? What is the folklore about it from their point of view? Undoubtedly their best historians will record it without bias, but will be the same as what we read? I'm not entirely sure.

That does not answer your question, but I have grave doubts that it is possible. Personal bias always comes into everything. I will say this about your question: we must do our best to present the facts in an unbiased manner. That's important because we need to have a true picture of what happened. Many times it is because historians don't want humanity committing the same errors as the events they are trying to make sense of.

So far we have not dropped an atomic weapon on anyone else. But there have been holocausts after the European one. What have we learned? That six million is a number beyond our understanding, and we have not grasped the enormity of the crime, bias or no bias.

6 0
2 years ago
After the signing of the Treaty of Ghent, there was a backlash against the Federalist Party because Americans believed the party
belka [17]

Answer:

After the signing of the Treaty of Ghent, there was a backlash against the Federalist Party because Americans believed the party wanted the northern states to <u>secede</u> from the United States and join with Britain.

Explanation:

The Treaty of Ghent, signed on 24 December 1814, was a peace treaty between the United States and the United Kingdom that put an end to the War of 1812 (1812-1815). The Treaty ceased all hostilities, restored the borders between the United States and British North America (which would later Canada) to prewar status, and restored diplomatic relations between both countries.

The War of 1812 wasn't popular in many northern states of the US, especially in New England, as the war had crippled the New England economy because of its major economic and trade links with British North America. The then ruling party in New England, the Federalist Party, opposed the war because of this and campaigned for peace with the British. When the <u>Treaty of Ghent was signed, there was a backlash against the Federalist Party, as Americans from other states believed the party wanted the northern states to secede from the United States and join with Britain</u>. However, the Federalists in New England took a moderate position, as they recognized that any moves towards secession would likely trigger a major conflict, and they worked towards restoring trade with the British instead.

6 0
3 years ago
What are the reasons why the Western Roman Empire disintegrated?
Degger [83]

Answer:

1. Invasions by Barbarian tribes.

2. Economic troubles and overreliance on slave labor.

3. The rise of the Eastern Empire.

4. Overexpansion and military overspending.

5. Government corruption and political instability.

6. The arrival of the Huns and the migration of the Barbarian tribes.

Explanation:

I hope this helps! Good Luck! ;)

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • how did immigration during the industrial revolution allow big U.S. companies to make even bigger profits​
    10·1 answer
  • Which of these writers helped bring about the breakup of the Standard Oil monopoly?
    12·1 answer
  • How did saddam Hussein’s occupation of Kuwait become an international crisis?
    7·1 answer
  • Who won the Gallipoli campaign the central or allied powers?
    7·2 answers
  • What impact did locomotives have in 1800s
    13·1 answer
  • In contrast to many native-born jews, most yiddish-speaking jews who arrived in the united states from eastern europe after the
    6·1 answer
  • What should boaters do to overcome biased information in political campaigns?
    13·1 answer
  • During his first inaugural address, Lincoln made which statement about slavery?
    14·2 answers
  • What are some other things Americans might have wanted in their<br> homes once they got electricity?
    9·2 answers
  • Analyze this piece of World War II propaganda and address the following:
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!