Answer: determined by a merit system based on civil service examinations
Explanation:
The <em>Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act </em>of 1883 was signed to overhaul Federal employment methods that favored political affiliation instead of merit.
In the 1870s, federal office holders were engaged in a form of patronage that would see them giving federal jobs to people who funded them or those who supported them politically.
This Act changed all that when it made it unlawful to give people jobs due to their political affiliation but rather on the basis of merit which would be determined by civil service examinations.
He invented the power loom.
Answer:
If land was leased to freedmen, landowners did not have to lay out cash for supplies.
<h3>Hope this is fine for you</h3>
Option B. Judicial review
Arizona. “Before questioning, the person should be warned that they have the right to remain silent, that their statements may be used as evidence, and that they have the right to have a commissioned or appointed attorney present.
The Supreme Court ruled in Miranda's side, and the police officer told the suspect during questioning, "He has the right to remain silent and what he says will be used against him in court." There is a possibility, and he has the right to do so."
In the landmark case of Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court ruled that if police do not notify the individual, they will do so with respect to certain individuals arrested in the United States. Their confessions cannot be used as evidence in court, in accordance with constitutional rights, including the Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination. .
Learn more about Miranda v. Arizona at
brainly.com/question/4429252
#SPJ1
