Answer:
A
Explanation:
Capitalistic economies tend to be somewhat more collectively oriented rather than individualistically oriented.
The correct answer is A) Bosses and subordinates each view the other as different types of people.
The Mexican culture has a tendency to accept large power distances. That is, in general, Mexicans believe that everyone has their place in an order of bosses and subordinates each view the other as different types of people.
Mexican workers have a peculiar way of thinking regarding the workplace and the bosses. Unfortunately for most Mexicans, they want to feel secure in a workplace with a salary and the certainty that their work is safe and they are going to keep it forever. And that is not the case anymore.
Mexican workers are not entrepreneurs who like to go and try something different, who wants to grow through meet different challenges in the workplace and having risks to overcome difficulties and aspire to new and better work positions.
They see their bosses so far away in the organizational hierarchy and do not have an interest -both, bosses and workers- to meet in the middle to try to establish a better relationship that helps the company to be more productive and the workers to grow and prosper.
The term that describes the period of time when humans turned from hunting and gathering to farming would be the Neolithic revolution. Also called as Agricultural Revolution or Demographic Transition. It happened first in Mesopotamia which is now known as Iraq. This revolution was a wide scale transition of a lot of cultures from hunting and gathering lifestyle into agriculture and settlement which caused an increase in a large population. The first plants that were domesticated are wheat, barley and other grains. The animals were pigs, cattle, goats and sheep. It happened around 9000 BC in the Fertile Crescent or Mesopotamia.
Answer:
Option A: Appeal to unqualified authority
Explanation:
Fallacies of Weak Induction
This is said to take place only occurs the premises used as provided to support for a conclusion, but it is not enough to believe the conclusion.
Types of Fallacies of Weak Induction
1. Appeal to Unqualified Authority, 2. Appeal to Ignorance
3. Hasty Generalization
4. False Cause
5. Slippery Slope
6. Weak Analogy
Appeal to Unqualified Authority
In this type of appeal, an arguer used a statement made by another person as a form of evidence for a conclusion, and usually, that person is not qualified to to make such a statement. It is also defined as when the arguer appeals to an inappropriate or unqualified authority or expert as the basis for accepting a conclusion, therefore the viewpoint of such an individual that is raised is said to be logically irrelevant. It is only when an appeal to a legitimate expert such as eye-witness in court case etc. then it is a type of inductive argument.
1. The national government had no power to impose taxes
2. There was no executive branch to enforce any acts passed by Congress
3. Laws required a 9/13 majority to pass in Congress
4. States were able to Levi tariffs on other state's goods
5. Amendments to the Articles of Confederation required a unanimous vote
6. Each state only had one vote in Congress, regardless of size
7. There was no National court system or judicial branch
