Answer: Modernism.
Nationalism.
Microtonal music
I got this from the Internet don't use it if you don't want to
Explanation:
C. Heroic subjects and pictures of the powerful
Answer:
Take it to an engineer
Explanation:
i has happened to me also there is no solution for it
hope that helps you
please follow
Answer:
Music incorporates all of the following factors already listed. Melodies are the principal aspect of a composition. It uses rhythm and pitches to make consonance, a pleasant timbre, or in other words to make a good sound. Generally, in music, harmony refers to chord structure, and most chord structures are based of scales and uses diatonic notes to make chord progressions that sound rather pleasant. If it doesn't use the notes within that certain scale. It would be considered atonal, or non-diatonic. The usage of atonality was most used during the 20th Century where that musical period was used for exploration and breaking the boundaries of music. In terms of "thick", it would mean there are many parts in the music, or in other words, it would be considered polyphonic, or homophonic.
I hoped this helps :)
Explanation:
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
According to the proposition that the term music is inescapably tied to Western culture and its assumptions, the Western culture is apparently doomed to a certain measure of ethnocentrism.
When we are referring to ethnocentrism, this means that some cultures think that their culture is superior the other cultures. This is an arrogant point of view in that one group of people considered themselves better just for the simple fact that their ancestors were better or more powerful.
This of course is part of some powerful countries in the western civilization that is reflected in cultural aspects such as music.
Ethnocentrism has been the generator of many ethnic and racial conflicts in the western world.
