1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
My name is Ann [436]
3 years ago
11

What are the advantages and limitations for historians in drawing on the writings of foreign observers?

History
2 answers:
jenyasd209 [6]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

In it, he invoked the principles of human equality contained in the Declaration of Independence and connected the sacrifices of the Civil War with the desire for “a new birth of freedom,” as well as the all-important preservation of the Union created in 1776 and its ideal of self-government

Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/13300150#readmore

Explanation:

kolbaska11 [484]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Writings of foreign observers is good to get new insights of different cultures, however it may ignore or mislead important aspects of the studied events.

Explanation:

Pros

  • It is helpful to see different insights about different events and cultures. Sometimes  when studying, for example, historical events in which the observer belongs to the same country, it is possible to bias the research and lead to incomplete conclusions. That bias is not likely to happening when a foreigner observer is doing the job because he/she is not influenced by local culture.

Cons

  • This is the counterweight of the previous advantage. It is true a foreign observer may be more impartial, but it is also true that if the observer is not very aware of the manners and culture of the civilization he/she is studying, then lack of information and incomplete conclusions may be stated.  It is necessary a balance between an impartial analysis and a well knowledge of culture of interest.

You might be interested in
Up until the 1500s, East Asia was mostly 1.<br> from the<br> rest of the world
crimeas [40]

Answer:

why is there only one option? you need to have more so people can answer your question fully

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Use this panel to write one paragraph to explain whether or not you think the Declaration of Independence upholds the political
Likurg_2 [28]
The Decleration of Independence does uphold the political principles because with out it or country would still be suffering for the lack of money and freedom because of Europe's greed. For example, imagine the U.S. becoming a country like South Africa. We would be poor and helpless because we would have no independence and the right to agree to trading and developing a economic system in general. So my overall arguement stands to show that I support the Decleration of Independence and that it upholds all of Americans political values.
8 0
2 years ago
How has the population of developed countries changed since 1950
natka813 [3]

Answer:

It has increased rapidly

Explanation:

In 1950 there were around <u>2.5 billion</u> people living in the world, while today that number is <u>7.5 billions.</u>

In most of the developed countries the population has grown rapidly, of course among the other things because health system in those countries has developed and is still developing pretty fast.

For example United States had 150 million inhabitants and now that number has doubled - more 320 millions.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following are true about The Confessions of Nat Turner?
KatRina [158]

The answer choice which are true about The Confessions of Nat Turner are:

  • B. It was published to take advantage of public interest.
  • C. It claimed to be a definitive account of Turner's motivations.

<h3>Nat Turner</h3>

He was an ex-slave who claimed to have received a divine mandate in order to free all slaves and to kill any slave owner.

He had a book  which was named "The Confessions of art Turner" which he told to a white lawyer about his divine inspiration and the morality of killing any slave owner he found.


With this in mind, we can see that the correct answers are options B and C

Read more about Nat Turner here:
brainly.com/question/20389403

3 0
2 years ago
What is one way in which Caesar Augustus improved Rome’s army?
7nadin3 [17]

Caesar Augustus hired more generals and this action improved the Rome’s army greatly.

<h3>Who was Caesar Augustus?</h3>

He is the first Roman emperor who reigned from 27 BC until his death in AD 14. He was known for being the founder of the Roman Principate as well.

During his reign, he improved the Roman army and the roads, and created a navy.

Therefore, the Option C is correct.

Read more about Caesar Augustus

brainly.com/question/15675630

#SPJ1

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • European countries MOST LIKELY wanted access to the Suez Canal because
    11·2 answers
  • Name one main success and one main failure of the Republic of Texas Government. Then tell how these factors contributed to Texas
    14·2 answers
  • HELP PLEASE
    15·2 answers
  • Which of our three branches of government can best represent and identify with the rights of the American people
    12·1 answer
  • What are three reasons that Muslim triumphed over the Hindu forces in India?​
    11·2 answers
  • In 1760, America's population was 92% this religion
    7·1 answer
  • HELP NOW!!! POR FAVOR DUE IN 10 MINS
    9·2 answers
  • Why did John Jay believe the Articles of Confederation were failing?
    13·1 answer
  • If u help me with these 15 questions ill give brainlest every time have to be right
    14·2 answers
  • Under the Dawes Act, the reservation land not allotted to American Indians was sold
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!