Answer:
unethical
1 what if the cookies where spiked. then what would he do?
2 if the cookies had something she was allergic to and they didn't ask
3 maybe their familie was being nice but i think the parole officer didn't trust them so led the exception to his wife to make sure
Explanation:
Yes. I don’t know much about this. But a retrial should be allowed, this is my opinion after reading this
What is Katz argument: The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for the Court.
What is the Katz v United States holding: The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for the Court.
False it’s a 10 year period
Answer:
a test of your school knowledge
Explanation:
