1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kirill [66]
3 years ago
8

PLEASE HELP ME! I'M STUCK!

History
2 answers:
Dmitry [639]3 years ago
5 0

The correct choices for this question would be the following:

B) He enacted an annual census to keep accurate records of his people and their properties.

C) He instituted a large bureaucracy to administer his commands. 

And 

<span>D) He reduced taxes to win favor among his citizens.

</span><span>Justinian is the most </span>famous<span> of all the </span>emperors<span> of the </span>Byzantine who is famous for his reforms and codification of law.
Furkat [3]3 years ago
4 0
How did Justinian unite the Byzantine Empire?

A. He adopted a uniform legal code for the empire.
D. He instituted a large bureaucracy to administer his commands.

Justinian established the Corpus Juris Civilis (Body of Civil Law), which codified and organized the system of laws for the empire.  Previously, the empire had inherited three separate law code systems and various individual laws from previous eras.  There were conflicting and outdated laws in the old systems, so Justinian established a commission to review all the laws and create a single, unified legal code.

As to bureaucracy, the Byzantine Empire inherited a complex system of bureaucracy and aristocracy from the Roman empire.  As with the legal code, Justinian organized and revised the bureaucracy system to the advantage of his governance of the empire.  He worked to streamline provincial bureaucracies in a way that gave more control to the emperor at the center of the governmental system.

<span>[A note on taxes:  Taxes were high under Justinian, and resentment over high taxes was part of the Nika riots that took place in 532 AD.]</span>
You might be interested in
How is the free soil party different from the know nothing party?
umka21 [38]

Answer:

The Know-Nothing Party was established in 1850.

In July of 1844, riots broke out in the city of Philadelphia. Nativists battled Irish immigrants which resulted up to two Catholic churches and a Catholic school being burned down.

The Know-Nothing Party was was an outgrowth of the strong anti-immigrant people.

In 1843, The Know-Nothings formed the American Republic Party.

1854 they had allied themselves with groups within another political party called the Whigs.

In 1855, The Know-Nothings dropped much of their secrecy and became known as the American Party.

FREE-SOILER PARTY

The Free-Soiler Party was a short political party in the US during 1848-1852 presidential elections

It was the 3rd largest party that grew it's greatest strength from New York.

The party leadership consisted of former anti-slavery members of the Whig Party and the Democratic Party.

Its main purpose was opposing the expansion of slavery into the western territories, arguing that free men on free soil comprised a morally and economically superior system to slavery.

Its presidential nominee in 1848, Martin Van Buren, received 291,616 votes against Zachary Taylor of the Whigs and Lewis Cass of the Democrats, but Van Buren received no electoral votes. The Party's "spoiler" effect in 1848 may have put Zachary Taylor into office in a narrowly-contested election.

The Compromise of 1850 temporarily neutralized the issue of slavery and undercut the party's no-compromise position. Most Barnburners returned to the Democratic party, and the Free Soil Party became dominated by ardent anti-slavery leaders.

The Free Soil Party was a notable third party. More successful than most, it sent two Senators and fourteen Representatives to the thirty-first Congress, which convened from March 4, 1849 to March 3, 1851.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Spanish -American war affect American expansionism
MrRissso [65]

During the reign of Queen Elizabeth I, English seafarers were often involved in attacks on Spanish treasure ships and on trading settlements in the Americas. These were carried out with Queen Elizabeth I’s encouragement, in an attempt to weaken the power of Spain rather than capture the empire. England’s main concern was the threat of invasion by Spain, and after the defeat of the Spanish Armada in 1588, England could feel secure. Gradually England started to look to expand her own empire in North America, leaving South America to Spain and Portugal.




3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What group believed that a strong central government should have more power than the individual states?
dimaraw [331]
The Anti-Federalists. 
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE NEED HELP Great Britain and France avoided a take over by Fascists by: restricting free speech. turning to a single-party
netineya [11]

Answer:

Explanation:

Instituted in the hope of avoiding war, appeasement was the name given to Britain’s policy in the 1930s of allowing Hitler to expand German territory unchecked. Most closely associated with British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, it is now widely discredited as a policy of weakness. Yet at the time, it was a popular and seemingly pragmatic policy.  Hitler’s expansionist aims became clear in 1936 when his forces entered the Rhineland. Two years later, in March 1938, he annexed Austria. At the Munich Conference that September, Neville Chamberlain seemed to have averted war by agreeing that Germany could occupy the Sudetenland, the German-speaking part of Czechoslovakia - this became known as the Munich Agreement. In Britain, the Munich Agreement was greeted with jubilation. However, Winston Churchill, then estranged from government and one of the few to oppose appeasement of Hitler, described it as ‘an unmitigated disaster’.  Appeasement was popular for several reasons. Chamberlain - and the British people - were desperate to avoid the slaughter of another world war. Britain was overstretched policing its empire and could not afford major rearmament. Its main ally, France, was seriously weakened and, unlike in the First World War, Commonwealth support was not a certainty. Many Britons also sympathised with Germany, which they felt had been treated unfairly following its defeat in 1918.  But, despite his promise of ‘no more territorial demands in Europe’, Hitler was undeterred by appeasement. In March 1939, he violated the Munich Agreement by occupying the rest of Czechoslovakia. Six months later, in September 1939, Germany invaded Poland and Britain was at war.

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was a direct result of the industrialization that began in the early 1900s?
garri49 [273]
<span>Industrialization leads to Urbanization. It created a economic growth and job opportunities that drew people to the cities. So A is the answer I believe</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Where are bills formally debated?
    10·1 answer
  • 50 words on how Betsy Ross and the American flag relates to the feminist movement of today.
    11·1 answer
  • Second only to Agriculture, many workers in the West worked in what industry?
    14·1 answer
  • How was the Philadelphia convention organized?
    12·1 answer
  • Please give a honest and correct answer ASAP
    6·2 answers
  • Pioneers usually migrated west ?
    10·1 answer
  • why did the united states enter world war 1? what role did the zimmermann telegram play in that decision?
    10·1 answer
  • What was one result of the French and Indian War?
    15·2 answers
  • Which two statements show the impact of the battle at Fort Sumter on April 12, 1861?
    11·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!!!! AND PONITS!!
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!