1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mars2501 [29]
3 years ago
15

Can you guys please read this history essay and give it a grade based on grammar, vocabulary, accuracy and weather it responds w

ell to the prompt; were the founding fathers justified in rebelling against Britain and declaring their independence?
Were the founding fathers of our country right to rebel against Britain and declare their independence? The founding fathers were 100 percent justified in their actions. Had they not built up the courage to stand up for themselves, America would not be the place it is today. The colonists did what they needed to do in order for themselves and the future people to have the lives we have. Think about how you would you react if our government decided to place unfair taxes and laws on us without following the laws they had put in place to ensure laws and taxes were fair.

One specific act that was unfair to the colonists was the quartering act. The quartering act forced colonists to allow British soldiers to live in their homes. This meant that the soldiers also ate the colonists food, took up one of their rooms, and got all this with no charge. This act was only one of the ways Britain angered the colonists and pushed them towards rebellion.

Some people might argue that the colonists should have respected their government. Though respect is a highly important part of any relationship, which the colonies had with the British government, it has to go both ways. How were the colonists going to be respectful towards Britain if Britain isn't going to be respectful in return? One time when this relationship was proven disrespectful on Britain's side was when the colonists protested "No taxation without representation". The British government pretended to honor this until they decided to place another taxing act on the colonists. Britain didn't even trust the colonies to govern them selves and as a result the colonies didn't trust the king or Britain at all.The colonist started out their settlement with respect for their country but that was lost due to many mistakes made by both parties.

The colonist bravery was essential in getting us were we are today. we can all do things that we individually believe to be rights. Well, a lot of the rights we have today were privileges that the colonists didn't have back then. Examples are; self government, trade with any country we desire, voting on laws, and that's just a few. Living without those things made a huge impact on the quality of life for the colonists. Having no choice in how your life was going to be or how your government was run is more than just undesirable. It was something that made the colonists actively try to part from Britain.

The stamp act was one of the first British placed acts to infuriate the colonists. This act said that "The colonists had to pay extra money to Britain every time they bought printed materials or legal documents." (Pg. 114 road to revolution text book). Anything that was made of paper had a tax that had to be proved you paid with a stamp. "They felt that the British government had no right to make them pay the tax because there were no colonial representatives in the British Parliament" (Pg. 115 road to revolution text book). Several other acts followed this as the colonist kept protesting them out and the British kept coming up with new ways to tax them. Some of the acts that followed the stamp act are the Townsend act, the tea act and the intolerable acts.

In response to the tea act, and the unfair treatment from before, the colonists met in a group in Boston and dumped 342 chests of tea into the harbor. This event is called "The Boston tea party" and is considered one of the main events that caused the war. The colonists dressed as Indians, snuck onto the boat and dumped the tea, that was worth around a million dollars of today's money. The British reacted to this incident by creating the intolerable acts which led to even more rebellion from the colonists.

The colonists did what they needed to do in order for themselves and the future people to have the lives we do. The colonists fought back against Britain by protesting, boycotting, throwing expensive tea into the ocean and fighting them in the revolutionary war. If the colonists didn't fight for their freedom, we might still be a part of Great Britain. Laws, rights, ways of living, eating, drinking. We would not be the country we are not if the colonists had just given in to the harsh laws enforced by Britain. So, the colonists were justified in resisting the British.
History
1 answer:
Likurg_2 [28]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

If I were a teacher I would probably give this a 80 or 82. All of the info is correct, but there are a lot of grammatical and vocab errors. I went ahead and revised it for you, the revised essay is below.

Explanation:

The founding fathers were justified in their actions to rebel against Britain, and declare their independence. Had they not built up the courage to stand up for themselves, America would not be the place it is today. The colonist's did what they needed to do in order to improve not only their own lives, but the lives of the generations that came after them. Think about how you would you react if our government decided to place unfair taxes and laws on us, going against the laws put in place to ensure fair and lawful taxation.

One specific act that was unfair to the colonists was the Quartering Act. The Quartering Act forced colonists to open their home to British soldiers at the drop of a pin. This means a soldier could knock on a colonist's door at any time and the colonist would have to give up a room for them, feed them, and allow them to stay however long they wanted; all without payment. This act was one of the ways Britain angered the colonists and pushed them towards rebellion.

Some people might argue that the colonists should have respected their government. Respect is an extremely important part of any relationship, but it has to go both ways; while the colonist's respected their government, there was no reciprocation of respect back to the colonists. Why would the colonists respect the British government if the British government won't respect them back? An example of how the British government disrespected the colonist is when they were protesting "No taxation without representation", the British government pretended to honor this but they eventually decided to place another taxing act on the colonists. As a result of the government's distrust in the colonies to govern themselves, the colonies did not trust the British government. The colonist's started their settlements with respect for their country, but due to mistakes from both parties, that respect was lost.

Many rights we have today are privileges that the colonists did not have; a few examples include; self government, trade with any country we desire, and voting for our laws. Living without those things made a huge impact on the quality of life for the colonists. Having no choice in how your life was going to be or how your government was run is more than just undesirable, it was something that made the colonists actively try to part from Britain.

The Stamp Act was one of the first British placed acts that infuriated the colonists. This act said "the colonists had to pay extra money to Britain every time they bought printed materials or legal documents". (Pg. 114 road to revolution text book). Anything that was made of paper had a tax; in order for their to be proof that you had paid the tax, you had to get a stamp and place it on the paper. "They felt that the British government had no right to make them pay the tax because there were no colonial representatives in the British Parliament" (Pg. 115 road to revolution text book). Several other acts followed this as the colonist kept protesting them out and the British kept coming up with new ways to tax them. Some of the acts that followed the stamp act are the Townsend act, the tea act and the intolerable acts.

In response to the Tea Act, and the unfair treatment from before, the colonists met in a group in Boston and dumped 342 chests of tea into the harbor. This event is called "The Boston Tea Party" and is considered one of the main events that caused the war. The colonists dressed as Indians, snuck onto the boat and dumped the tea, that was worth around a million dollars of today's money. The British reacted to this incident by creating the Intolerable Acts which led to even more rebellion from the colonists.

The colonists did what they needed to do in order for themselves and the generations after them to live a good life. The colonist's fought back against Britain by protesting, boycotting, throwing expensive tea into the ocean and fighting them in the Revolutionary War. If the colonists didn't fight for their freedom, we might still be a part of Great Britain. We would not be the country we are if the colonists had given in to the harsh laws enforced by Britain; therefore, the colonist's were justified in rebelling against and declaring their independence from Britain.

You might be interested in
The conference at Potsdam was tense because the:
love history [14]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

There was a fear of communism in the US and Europe.

3 0
2 years ago
Why was the 2000 presidential election significant? Give and explain two reasons.
PtichkaEL [24]
It was the year when the two candidates were very close. and it was one of the only elections that the lose won the popular vote
7 0
3 years ago
Why was the sumerian much more advance than other civiliation.
Elena-2011 [213]
They had the ability to take inventions created elsewhere and use them on a much bigger scale.
5 0
3 years ago
What statement best explains the three-fifths compromise
larisa [96]
When counting the population in states 3/5th of slaves would be counted toward population when getting seats/places in the House of Representatives 
5 0
4 years ago
Write a response to each question.​
Oxana [17]

Answer: could you zoom or type it I can’t see it

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What statement best describes the Yongle Encyclopedia that originated during the Ming Dynasty?
    7·2 answers
  • Who won the french and indian war ?
    9·1 answer
  • How did Theodore Roosevelt's interest in conservation affect U.S. society?
    9·1 answer
  • Use a diagram like this one to show reasons for the decline of reconstruction
    5·1 answer
  • Which of these reflects the working conditions of the first factory workers in America? A. Many brought their families to work a
    9·1 answer
  • Who can help on this??
    8·1 answer
  • 4. What universal theme is depicted in the three pieces of art found here?
    12·2 answers
  • Should war have rules? In other words, should people, or militaries be allowed to use any tactics while engaging in combat with
    5·1 answer
  • Archduke Francis Ferdinand was assassinated over what issue?
    15·1 answer
  • How far does the Spanish empire stretch in the Americas
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!