<span>The scenario best illustrates a merger. A merger describes the joining of two independent companies to form a combined entity. Mergers tend to be friendly; in mergers, the target Frm would like to be acquired The management at Torque Autos Inc. and RedWing Automobiles Inc. realized that by combining the two entities the stakeholders of both the companies would benefit. Their core competencies would act as complementary assets to each other. Consequently, RedWing Automobiles joined together with Torque Autos to form a combined entity called TorqueWing Autos Inc.</span>
Answer:
False. Have a Good day I hope this helps
Explanation:
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario Warren is most likely trying to reduce a new customer's cognitive dissonance. By doing so he is trying to relieve the worry that new customers may have, as they may not know about the technology and may have inconsistent or contradictory beliefs/ideas regarding the technology. Therefore by providing all that Warren is offering he is clearing up these misconceptions that the customers may be having.
Answer:
Hello your question is incomplete attached below is the complete question
Explanation:
Dead weight loss = 0.5 [( Δp ) * ( ΔD ) ]
D = DEMAND
P = PRICE
DWL with quota = 0.5 [ ( $10 -$6 ) * (12 - 8 ) ]
= 0.5 ( 4*4 ) = $8
DWL with pigouvian tax = 0.5 [ ($10- $6 )*(9 - 8 ) ]
= 0.5 [ 4 * 1 ] = $2
Answer:
1. 80,000
2. $40 per barrel
Explanation:
1. As we can see from the table provided The equilibrium quantity in this market is 80,000 barrels of heating oil per day, as quantity demanded match quantity supplied
2. As we can see from the table provided The equilibrium price is $40 per barrel as in this cost there is an intersection of quantity demanded and quantity supplied. In other words the equilibrium price and quantity could be find out when the quantity demanded equal to quantity supplied