The reason for which Brinkmanship had been considered a bold, as well as, an aggressive idea would be:
<h3>What is Brinkmanship?</h3>
Brinkmanship is defined as the hunt towards a particular benefit by taking a risk instead of giving up. Brinkmanship is the practice of trying to achieve a profitable outcome by pushing dangerous events on the brink of an ongoing conflict.
This strategy is based on international politics, foreign policy, labor relations, modern military strategy, and high-profile cases.
The idea is considered an aggressive idea because it involves a greater and more dangerous level of risk i.e. "pretending an attack to take the enemy down.'
However, the idea is dangerous but it contains an advantage on the hand if it gets successful.
Thus, option C is the correct answer that is bluffing an enemy into thinking it would be attacked.
To learn more about Brinkmanship, refer:
brainly.com/question/807188
I believe the answer for this one is that the Nazis blamed the Jews for social, political, economic conditions in Germany. The Germans would soon take it to the extreme, and "punish" them by committing one of the worst crimes possible, genocide, because of the Anti-Semistic views.
People thought that large feet for women were basically a crime, so foot bindings were popular.
Answer:
He demanded their removal and also announced a naval blockade of Cuba to prevent the Soviets from installing more missiles.
