1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
melamori03 [73]
3 years ago
5

Which of the following statements describes the relationship between the third German Emperor Wilheim II and Bismarck, prior to

Bismarck's dismissal from government? A. The Kaiser played less of a role than did Bismarck in directing the foreign affairs of Germany. B. The Franco-Prussian War resulted in Wilheim II playing a larger role than Bismarck in German politics. C. Wilheim II wanted to end Bismarck's growing influence over German politics. D. The process of German unification was primarily led by the Kaiser with Bismarck playing a minor role.
History
2 answers:
Gelneren [198K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

C. Wilheim II wanted to end Bismarck's growing influence over German politics

Explanation:

Following unification, Wilhelm II dismissed Bismarck from his position as Chancellor because he wanted control over the foreign policy of Germany. This decision however resulted in the breakdown of the balance of power created by Bismarck between Russia, Germany, and France. The result was a complex system of treaty arrangements that finally led to World War I.

AlladinOne [14]3 years ago
4 0
"Wilheim II wanted to end Bismarck's growing influence over German politics" is the statement among the choices given in the question that describes the relationship between the third German Emperor Wilheim II and Bismarck, prior to Bismarck's dismissal from <span>government. The correct option is option "C". </span>
You might be interested in
Which tactic did Vladimir Lenin not employ following the Russian Revolution?
vampirchik [111]
The correct answer is <span> (C) expansion of democracy.
 
The reason why is that after the Revolution, Lenin worked to establish the Soviet state. In it, religion was suppressed (they seized church property as part of their actions), began arresting the leaders of opposition parties, and nationalized banks and factories handing control over to the Soviet system.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
What does the phrase “to ourselves and our posterity” suggest about the founding father’s goals?
Vanyuwa [196]

Answer:

Your answer would be D.

Explanation: Just took the quiz. :))

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
what is one reason thomas paine believes that the youth of the colonies is an advantage over great britain
dalvyx [7]
<span>One of the reasons why Thomas Paine believes that the youth of the colonies is an advantage over Britain is that the there is more vibrant energy--also that they can entice creditors from overseas. </span>
3 0
3 years ago
What was nativism and how did it affect immigrants
Ratling [72]

Nativism is the political position of preserving status for certain established inhabitants of a nation as compared to claims of newcomers or immigrants. It is characterized by opposition to immigration based on fears that the immigrants will distort or spoil existing cultural values

8 0
3 years ago
Suppose a country comes out of world war 2 with increased territory but much structural damage. It employs a commandshow has the
abruzzese [7]

Answer:  As with any well thought out and planned packaging scheme, the science of

military packaging for the United States Government developed from a well recognized logistical

need. This science has evolved over the course of its life to accommodate the many technology

changes in how the military distributes its supplies. It remains a dynamic force that can either

provide a positive or negative contribution to the success of military missions. Unlike most elements

of military doctrine, military packaging is rarely understood and appreciated for its contributions,

thus making it a prime target for criticisms from uninformed opinions.

The purpose of this paper is to make the reader aware of the basic reasons behind why military

packaging exists. This paper will review the many historic factors that first led military leaders to

recognize the need to protect supplies and equipment, and then follow the evolution of the science of

military packaging through current day practices.

GENESIS: The need for specific military procedures and requirements on how to package materiel

first surfaced on two different fronts. The Army had run sustainment exercises to Iceland during the

summer of 1941, and experienced high levels of supply losses that troop units attributed to bad

packaging. The same problem hit the Navy quite dramatically during the amphibious operations at

Guadalcanal in 1942. The commercial packaging that the Army, Navy and Marine Corps used during

the early months of World War II colossally failed to serve its intended purpose, and seriously

jeopardized the War Department's and Navy Department's abilities to sustain operations then being

planned. No one in either of those Departments had paid attention to the changes that had occurred in

packaging designs since Armistice Day.

In 1918, the most common shipping containers for military supplies were wood boxes, crates,

kegs and barrels. These were very much like the common commercial shipping containers of that

era, and were well-suited for all types of supply distribution environments. These containers were

heavy-duty, sturdy designs, generally built by craftsmen. With proper care, some surviving examples

of these containers could be readily used today as intended.

Immediately prior to World War II, military planners failed to recognize that the packaging they

had been receiving with their supplies would not meet their vital needs for overseas operations.

Industry had recognized that they could lower costs and improve profit margins by getting their

products to market in suitable packaging that weighed less and cost less to produce than traditional

packaging. In 1914, American railroads, who at the time were carrying most of the freight in the

United States, recognized and authorized the use of corrugated and solid fiberboard shipping

containers for packing many different types of products. Motor carriers, in turn, followed the

railroads' example in 1935 when they adopted their own packaging rules that often called for

fiberboard boxes. The United States Treasury Department issued the first federal specifications for

corrugated and solid "fiber boxes" in 1930 for packing supplies used by the civil agencies.

Industry, at the time, was also moving toward marketing plans that products would be consumed

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which president was the best while in office? And why? (Please explain)
    12·1 answer
  • How much is 6 3/4 - 2 3/12 ?
    11·1 answer
  • Que diferencia hay entre el tipitaka y el tripitaka?
    11·1 answer
  • What is one advantage a primary source has over a secondary source
    6·1 answer
  • What role did Neal Dow play in regulating America's use of alcohol?
    12·2 answers
  • SOUTHERNERS FEARED LINCOLN WOULD END SLAVERY AND SO 11 STATES SECEEDED AND CALLED
    14·1 answer
  • the meaning of “our freedom of speech is freedom or death” 4/5 lines pls help l will really appreciate !!!!!!
    11·1 answer
  • IM BEGGIN YA HELP PLZZZ :,) Which of the following statements about the Reconstruction Treaties of 1866 is false?
    13·1 answer
  • Was the cause of the men at the alamo right?
    8·1 answer
  • What was the result of J.P. Morgan able to control his competition?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!