1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
melamori03 [73]
3 years ago
5

Which of the following statements describes the relationship between the third German Emperor Wilheim II and Bismarck, prior to

Bismarck's dismissal from government? A. The Kaiser played less of a role than did Bismarck in directing the foreign affairs of Germany. B. The Franco-Prussian War resulted in Wilheim II playing a larger role than Bismarck in German politics. C. Wilheim II wanted to end Bismarck's growing influence over German politics. D. The process of German unification was primarily led by the Kaiser with Bismarck playing a minor role.
History
2 answers:
Gelneren [198K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

C. Wilheim II wanted to end Bismarck's growing influence over German politics

Explanation:

Following unification, Wilhelm II dismissed Bismarck from his position as Chancellor because he wanted control over the foreign policy of Germany. This decision however resulted in the breakdown of the balance of power created by Bismarck between Russia, Germany, and France. The result was a complex system of treaty arrangements that finally led to World War I.

AlladinOne [14]3 years ago
4 0
"Wilheim II wanted to end Bismarck's growing influence over German politics" is the statement among the choices given in the question that describes the relationship between the third German Emperor Wilheim II and Bismarck, prior to Bismarck's dismissal from <span>government. The correct option is option "C". </span>
You might be interested in
What destroyed the Roman economy during<br> the 3rd century
Studentka2010 [4]

Answer:

The main reason for the destruction of Roman economy lies in the fact that during 3rd Century there were constant wars in the country with only one goal, and that was the fight for power. Between 235 and 284 there were as many as 26 claimants to the throne.

Explanation:

This period of constant wars destroyed not only economy, but also society and institutions. At the end, Diocletian who ruled after this period tried to fix some problems through reforms, but of course it was hard to repair everything that was destroyed.

7 0
2 years ago
The Apollo-Soyuz Test Project was a joint United States-U.S.S.R. venture to __________.
Sonja [21]
The Apollo-Soyuz Test Project was a joint United States-U.S.S.R. venture to live and work together on a space platform in orbit.
7 0
3 years ago
What seems to be the ultimate goal of the KKK?
Anna11 [10]
Their goal was to get rid of black people
8 0
3 years ago
HELP!!
nata0808 [166]
The answer is D; nationalism. It is known as the support/love for ones own country or a certain country.
7 0
3 years ago
How did competition between European nations contribute to geographic changes around the world in the 16th to 18th centuries? Ex
Molodets [167]
Trade played a more central role in the mercantilist period of European history from 1500 to 1750 – sometimes referred to as early capitalism or trade capitalism – than in almost any other period.1<span> We must begin with the questions: When in human history did the first exchange of goods between </span>Europe<span> and the other four continents of </span>Africa<span>, </span>Asia<span>, </span>America<span> and </span>Australia<span>occur? Where are the origins of what one could describe as on-going exchange, as established economic relations to be found? These questions refer to an even larger global context because the global economic edifice changed fundamentally from "proto-globalization" to </span><span>globalization </span>.2<span> This process was primarily determined by Europe from the 15th to the 20th century. From the 16th century to 1914, trade within Europe at all times constituted the most significant portion of global trade, and the volume of that trade grew disproportionately quickly during the early modern period and into the modern period.</span>3<span> National markets became increasingly interconnected, driven by numerous innovations in the areas of infrastructure, </span>transportation<span>, energy supply, and – not least – institutions (rules, constitutions, division of labour, currency standards, etc.). The transition from individual production to </span><span>mass production </span><span> and the convergence of prices of goods and materials made transactions considerab</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What problems did the patronage system create?
    10·1 answer
  • Which is NOT an example of the human cost of industrialization?
    12·2 answers
  • Which US president was involved in the creation of the Panamá Canal?
    8·1 answer
  • Someone help plzzz!!! <br> I have to show all my work
    10·1 answer
  • Which statement is true of the ancient Olympics?
    7·1 answer
  • What was the significance and lasting impact of the Junto, Benjamin Franklin’s discussion group?
    15·2 answers
  • Which amendment codified the Tyler precedent
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following did NOT move the United States toward war in 1917?
    7·1 answer
  • Explain the reasons for the social collapse of Muslims during the British Rule.
    13·1 answer
  • In many ways Occom is an extraordinary figure, since no more than a small fraction of Native Americans converted to Christianity
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!