1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
slava [35]
3 years ago
14

Suppose a country comes out of world war 2 with increased territory but much structural damage. It employs a commandshow has the

development of standardized shipping containers contribute to the growth of globalization?
History
1 answer:
abruzzese [7]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:  As with any well thought out and planned packaging scheme, the science of

military packaging for the United States Government developed from a well recognized logistical

need. This science has evolved over the course of its life to accommodate the many technology

changes in how the military distributes its supplies. It remains a dynamic force that can either

provide a positive or negative contribution to the success of military missions. Unlike most elements

of military doctrine, military packaging is rarely understood and appreciated for its contributions,

thus making it a prime target for criticisms from uninformed opinions.

The purpose of this paper is to make the reader aware of the basic reasons behind why military

packaging exists. This paper will review the many historic factors that first led military leaders to

recognize the need to protect supplies and equipment, and then follow the evolution of the science of

military packaging through current day practices.

GENESIS: The need for specific military procedures and requirements on how to package materiel

first surfaced on two different fronts. The Army had run sustainment exercises to Iceland during the

summer of 1941, and experienced high levels of supply losses that troop units attributed to bad

packaging. The same problem hit the Navy quite dramatically during the amphibious operations at

Guadalcanal in 1942. The commercial packaging that the Army, Navy and Marine Corps used during

the early months of World War II colossally failed to serve its intended purpose, and seriously

jeopardized the War Department's and Navy Department's abilities to sustain operations then being

planned. No one in either of those Departments had paid attention to the changes that had occurred in

packaging designs since Armistice Day.

In 1918, the most common shipping containers for military supplies were wood boxes, crates,

kegs and barrels. These were very much like the common commercial shipping containers of that

era, and were well-suited for all types of supply distribution environments. These containers were

heavy-duty, sturdy designs, generally built by craftsmen. With proper care, some surviving examples

of these containers could be readily used today as intended.

Immediately prior to World War II, military planners failed to recognize that the packaging they

had been receiving with their supplies would not meet their vital needs for overseas operations.

Industry had recognized that they could lower costs and improve profit margins by getting their

products to market in suitable packaging that weighed less and cost less to produce than traditional

packaging. In 1914, American railroads, who at the time were carrying most of the freight in the

United States, recognized and authorized the use of corrugated and solid fiberboard shipping

containers for packing many different types of products. Motor carriers, in turn, followed the

railroads' example in 1935 when they adopted their own packaging rules that often called for

fiberboard boxes. The United States Treasury Department issued the first federal specifications for

corrugated and solid "fiber boxes" in 1930 for packing supplies used by the civil agencies.

Industry, at the time, was also moving toward marketing plans that products would be consumed

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Complete this statement with the correct answer: A mixed economy is one that has no government control
stiv31 [10]
A mixed economy is one that has no government control "<span>of many industries that are owned by private individuals," since this still allows the government to control other aspects of the economy. </span>
7 0
3 years ago
What were some of the laws that were passed under the Napoleonic Code that show that Napoleon was influenced by the Enlightenmen
Zielflug [23.3K]
He re-hauled and rewrote the criminal and civil procedure codes because the old ones were archaic and represented old times. The codes were more accessible to people and modernized according to enlightenment philosophies. He also introduced codes about education which resulted in numerous new schools and universities being opened.
4 0
3 years ago
What did the Camp David Accords achieve?
emmainna [20.7K]
A. a peace treaty between Egypt and Israel 

The Camp David Accord was a peace treaty signed between the Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin and the Egyptian President Anwar Al Sadat. The US President Jimmy Carter was also present when the treaty was signed. The treaty was preceded by twelve days of secret negotiaitions between the three at Camp David which is where the treat borrowed its name from. This took place on 17 September 1978.  
3 0
2 years ago
Why do you think the Phoenicians interrupted their voyage to plant crops?
Airida [17]

Answer:

The Phoenicians were prominent traders in their time, and their main export was snails. Purple dye could be extracted from the snails and used as ink, and they also formed the basis for the modern alphabet. In fact, they created the first widely used writing system in history.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
The following event changed the course of the war in Vietnam. During the lunar new year, both sides in the Vietnam war agreed to
Readme [11.4K]

Answer:

The Tet offensive of 1968 (Vietnamese: Sự kiện Tết Mậu Thân 1968), also called the general offensive and uprising of Tet Mau Than[15] (Vietnamese: Tổng tiến công và nổi dậy, Tết Mậu Thân 1968) was a major escalation and one of the largest military campaigns of the Vietnam War. It was launched on January 30, 1968 by forces of the Viet Cong (VC) and North Vietnamese People's Army of Vietnam (PAVN) against the forces of the South Vietnamese Army of the Republic of Vietnam (ARVN), the United States Armed Forces and their allies. It was a campaign of surprise attacks against military and civilian command and control centers throughout South Vietnam.[16] The name is the truncated version of the Lunar New Year festival name in Vietnamese, Tết Nguyên Đán.[17]

Explanation:

The offensive was launched prematurely in the late night hours of 30 January in the I and II Corps Tactical Zones of South Vietnam. This early attack allowed allied forces some time to prepare defensive measures. When the main operation began the next morning, the offensive was countrywide and well coordinated; eventually more than 80,000 PAVN/VC troops struck more than 100 towns and cities, including 36 of 44 provincial capitals, five of the six autonomous cities, 72 of 245 district towns, and the southern capital.[18] The offensive was the largest military operation conducted by either side up to that point in the war.

Hanoi had launched the offensive in the belief that it would trigger a popular uprising leading to the collapse of the South Vietnamese government. Although the initial attacks stunned the allies, causing them to lose control of several cities temporarily, they quickly regrouped, beat back the attacks, and inflicted heavy casualties on PAVN/VC forces. The popular uprising anticipated by Hanoi never happened. During the Battle of Huế, intense fighting lasted for a month, resulting in the destruction of the city. During their occupation, the PAVN/VC executed thousands of people in the Massacre at Huế. Around the U.S. combat base at Khe Sanh, fighting continued for two more months.

The offensive was a military defeat for North Vietnam. However this offensive had far reaching consequences due to its effect on the views of the Vietnam War by the American public. General Westmoreland reported that defeating the PAVN/VC would require 200,000 more American soldiers and activation of the reserves, prompting even loyal supporters of the war to see that the current war strategy required re-evaluation.[19] The offensive had a strong effect on the U.S. government and shocked the U.S. public, which had been led to believe by its political and military leaders that the North Vietnamese were being defeated and incapable of launching such an ambitious military operation; American public support for the war declined as a result of the Tet casualties and the ramping up of draft calls.[20] Subsequently, the U.S. sought negotiations to end the war.

The term "Tet offensive" usually refers to the January–February 1968 offensive, but it can also include the so-called "Mini-Tet" offensive that took place in May and the Phase III offensive in August, or the 21 weeks of unusually intense combat which followed the initial attacks in January.[21]

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which person would have been LEAST LIKELY to become enslaved in sixteenth-century China?
    15·2 answers
  • Who was responsible for the TWA Flight 847 hijacking?
    10·2 answers
  • What role did george childress play in the texas revolution?
    5·1 answer
  • 2. Summarizing Use your graphic organizer to write a paragraph analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of different systems o
    12·1 answer
  • How were women treated in East Asia?
    11·1 answer
  • What event turned public opinion against Germany
    12·1 answer
  • The laws of Ancient Greece applied to __________.
    12·2 answers
  • Most of what we know about the Olmec civilization comes from
    10·1 answer
  • What role can the president play in the length of a session of Congress?​
    13·1 answer
  • What did the Reorganization Act of 1939 create?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!