Answer:
Point B
Step-by-step explanation:
Inside the darkest part where both inequalities are true
Answer:
2.80
Step-by-step explanation:
The discount is the regular price times the discount
discount = 19 *15%
discount = 2.85
The new price is the regular price minus the discount
new price = 19-2.85
=16.15
Now she has to pay the sales tax
tax = new price * tax rate
tax= 16.15 * 6.5%
= 16.15 *.065
=1.05
We add the tax to the new price to get the final price
final price = new price+tax
= 16.15 +1.05
=17.20
She pays with a 20 dollar bill
Change = payment - final price
=20.00 - 17.20
= 2.80
Answer: Option #4: the 0.2 could be changed to 2.
Explanation:
The table is designed to make the concept of percentages more understandable. The table first allocates the total amount of 70 in terms of its "fifths," or 20% parts. Then it expresses these parts in the last row of the table, showing that 20% of 70 is 14 and all the five parts sum up to 70 again.
Now, Mikel is supposed to express 40% of the amount. So she writes (incorrectly): 0.2 * 14. This statement needs to be changed to 2 * 14 (two times 14 = 28), to correspond to 2 times 20%, or 40% of 70.
This is reflected in the last (fourth) option "The 0.2 in the expression could be changed to 2."
Option #3 is incorrect because changing 14 to 70, will result in an incorrect number (2.8).
Options 1 and 2 are similarly incorrect (as can be easily verified)
Answer:
The given statement is "True".
Step-by-step explanation:
A statistical analytical technique that divides the perceived aggregate unpredictability present throughout an information source even further into 2 components.
- Systemic components
- Random components
If relevant information yet another category independent variable, as well as another quantifiable variable of interest, has been obtained, are using a single-way ANOVA.
Thus the above is the true answer.
Will u did your math wong
