Think about the idea here and you'll see how the idea of "cost" is inevitable in every decision. (It's true not just of governments, but of our own decisions too -- but we'll focus on governments here.)
Let's say the government decides it wants all citizens to have access to health care. Well, that's going to cost dollars to pay for that health care. Where will those dollars come from?
Let's say the government decides, in response to school shootings or other acts of gun violence, to ban certain types of guns or ammunition. That costs something to the gun dealers who were making money off those sales (and they'll object). Or let's say the government decides to do further and deeper background checks on all gun buyers. Well, that will cost something in terms of personnel and processes to accomplish all the background checks. Or let's say the government decides to increase mental health screenings and treatment because persons with mental illness issues may become violent and dangerous to society. That will cost much in order to organize and carry out better mental health intervention across the country.
I focused on just a couple issues there (health care, gun control). But the same principle holds on anything government does. You can think about your own examples that you'd want to use. Anything the government decides to do comes with some sort of costs attached. That doesn't mean it's bad to make such decisions -- it just means we need to count the cost and invest our efforts where they will have the best benefit.
Developed Pan African Africanism
wrote a book that promoted African Independence
Part of the first political party before his rule
Hi friend, your answer is Nat turner's rebellion.
Hope it helps you.
Interactions occur between the electrons on the outer most electron shell(valence electrons). Electrons are either gained or lost while bonding with other atoms.
Answer:
<em><u>The Constitution replaced the preexisting legislative document, which was the Articles of Confederation; this document was responsible for the conveyance of legal process within the United States of American – however, many historians classify the Articles of Confederation to be reactionary to the unpleasant conditions under which citizens of the United States lived with regard </u></em>
Explanation: