All categories

2 years ago

Third Parties In General (not Just With Health Care) Are Inefficient Because

Business

1 answer:

goldenfox [79]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Third Parties In General (not Just With Health Care) Are Inefficient Because

b) it means a large bureaucracy.

Explanation:

Ordinarily, in an efficient market, there are no third parties. The market participants remain buyers and sellers. They are aided in their business dealings and for the determination of prices during the exchange by the invisible hand. It is the invisible hand that ensures the existence of market equilibrium between demand and supply. If this invisible hand is removed and a third party comes in to regulate the market and the activities of the market participants, usually the government, it implies that bureaucracy will increase. It has been established that decisions made by the state are not always efficient because more costs are added to the decision-making process.

You might be interested in

In divisional income statements prepared for Lemons Company, the Payroll Department costs are allocated to user divisions on the

AlladinOne [14]

Answer:

Lemons Company

a. Total amount of payroll checks = 920

amount of purchase requisitions = 12,500

b-a Residential Commercial Government Total

Payroll $32,832 $19,152 $10,944 $62,928

b-b Purchasing

Costs $17,688 $4,717 $7,075 $29,480

c. Residential's service department charge is __higher__ than the other two divisions because Residential is a user of service department services. Residential has many employees on a weekly payroll, which translates into a __higher__ number of payroll transactions.

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

Cost of the Payroll Department = $62,928

Cost of the Purchasing Department = $29,480

Residential Commercial Government Total

Contract

Sales $2,000,000 $3,250,000 $2,900,000 $8,150,000

Weekly payroll

(52 weeks per year) 400 250 150 800

Monthly payroll 80 30 10 120

Total 480 280 160 920

Number of purchase

requisitions per year 7,500 3,000 2,000 12,500

a. Total amount of payroll checks = 920 (800 + 120)

Total amount of purchase requisitions = 12,500

b-a Residential Commercial Government Total

Payroll $32,832 $19,152 $10,944 $62,928

(480/920 * $62,928) (280/920 * $62,928) (160/920 * $62,928)

b-b Purchasing

Costs $17,688 $4,717 $7,075 $29,480

(7,500/12,500 * $29,480) (2,000/12,500 * $29,480) (3,000/12,500 * $29,480)

Total $50,520 $23,869 $18,019 $92,408

Percentage 54.7% 25.8% 19.5% 100%

4 0

3 years ago

Some risks can be mitigated

OverLord2011 [107]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

If a natural disaster occurs, house insurance can prevent you from further financial loss, as some compensation would be given.

4 0

3 years ago

A new highway is to be constructed.

baherus [9]

Answer:

Desing B

Total Present worth $ 502.485,35‬

Annual worth: $ 49,722.003

Option 2:

Total Present worth $ 666.441,33‬

Annual worth: $ 53,845.798

Explanation:

<h2>Desing A</h2>

$85 x 5280 = 448,800

$4 x 3 x 5280 = 63,360

$8000 x 4 = 32,000

total cost: 544,160‬

Annual cost:

11,800 + 300 = 12,100

PV of the annual maintenance:

$C \times \frac{1-(1+r)^{-time} }{rate} = PV\\$

C 12,100.00

time 16

rate 0.06

$12100 \times \frac{1-(1+0.06)^{-16} }{0.06} = PV\\$

PV $122,281.3328

Present worth:

total cost to construct 544,160‬ + maintenance $122,281.33 = 666.441,33

Annual worth:

$PV \div \frac{1-(1+r)^{-time} }{rate} = C\\$

PV 544,160

time 16

rate 0.06

$544160 \div \frac{1-(1+0.06)^{-16} }{0.06} = C\\$

C $ 53,845.798

<h2>Desing B</h2>

a mile is equivalent to 5,280 foot

paviment $40 x 5,280 = $ 211,200

sood ditched 2 per foot x 5,280 foot per mile x $1.40 = $ 12,038.4

pipe culvert 2,200 x 2 = 4,400

Total value to construct: 227.638,4‬

PV of maintenance:

replacement 2,400 x 2 = 4,800 (in 8 years)

$\frac{Maturity}{(1 + rate)^{time} } = PV$

Maturity $4,800.0000

time 8.00

rate 0.06000

$\frac{4800}{(1 + 0.06)^{8} } = PV$

PV 3,011.5794

maintenance $2,900

culverts 2 x $ 230 = $ 460

ditch 1.45 x 5,280 x 2 = $ 15,312

Total yearly cost: 18.672‬

PV of this annuity over 16 years:

$C \times \frac{1-(1+r)^{-time} }{rate} = PV\\$

C 18,672.00

time 16

rate 0.06

$18672 \times \frac{1-(1+0.06)^{-16} }{0.06} = PV\\$

PV $188,697.2765

PV of the replacement bituminous concrete

$\frac{Maturity}{(1 + rate)^{time} } = PV$

Maturity $211,200.0000

time 16.00

rate 0.06000

$\frac{211200}{(1 + 0.06)^{16} } = PV$

PV 83,138.0951

Present worth:

Total value to construct: $ 227.638,4‬ +

yearly cost PB $ 188,697.28 +

concrete replacement $ 83,138.0951

culvert replacement: $ 3,011.58

Total Present worth 502.485,35‬

Annual worth:

$PV \div \frac{1-(1+r)^{-time} }{rate} = C\\$

$502485.35 \div \frac{1-(1+0.06)^{-16} }{0.06} = C\\$

C $ 49,722.003

6 0

2 years ago

Alex received two job offers. He is not sure whether he should take a job at the movie theater that is close to his house and pa

soldi70 [24.7K]

He should take the movie theater job bc it’s closer to him and almost the same amount of money.

4 0

2 years ago

Suppose that the MPC is 0.8 and that $18 trillion of real GDP is currently being demanded. The government wants to increase real

Bingel [31]

Answer: $200 billion

Explanation:

First find the government spending multiplier:

Multiplier = 1 / (1 - MPC)

= 1 / (1 - 0.8)

= 5

The government wants to increase the real GDP to $19 trillion from $18 trillion which means that they want to increase it by $1 trillion.

In order to increase it by $1 trillion, the amount the government needs to spend is:

Increase in real GDP = Multiplier * Government spending

1 trillion = 5 * Government spending

Government spending = 1 trillion / 5

= $200 billion

4 0

2 years ago