First off we have the same name.
But I will answer your question if you answer mine. Do you mean to write a letter for teens to read (hypothetically)? As in " Dear teens, You need to take a look in the mirror and note all of the good things about yourself......"?
Answer:
get good grades and works good
Explanation:
Answer:
Iago gives several reasons for his hatred of Othello (usually to his confidant Roderigo). He says that he hates Othello because Othello passed him over for a promotion to lieutenant, choosing Michael Cassio (who he claims is much less qualified) instead of him.
The correct answer is: Ensure that evidence is reasonable.
A logical fallacy refers to an error done in reasoning which makes an argument invalid. The conclusion of the argument doesn't follow logically from what peceded it.
A simple example would be: The toucan flies. The parrot flies, Therefore all birds fly.
Here we are making an erroneus conclusion by just using two examples to generalize an entire specie. If our evidence was checked in a correct way we would know that penguins or chickens don't fly.
Ensuring that the evidence is reasonable implies a deeper research on the topic and therefore a more complete knowledge about it. It is more probable to avoid making logical fallacies in this way. Empirical data will also help the author developing stronger arguments as they are supported by empirical evidence.
Using only pathos doesn't prevent you from making a logical fallacy, as the arguments to provoke an emotion could be wrong too, failling on it's purpose.