Answer:
Becuase the British would not let them have a diffrent faith or religion, it was only what the king said you. if the king said you were Christian you were Christian if the king said you were Muslim. If you denied what the king said, he would excute you for treason
Explanation:
That's why we have the first amendment, freedom of speech; which allows us to say whatever we want and also beleve in whatever we want. (Unless it is harming yourselves or other people)
Answer:
From the very beginning Americans developed a unique system of government with revolutionary ideals like representative. This atmosphere of new ideas and new political rights fostered a growing sense of a unique American identity. The American Revolution produced a new outlook among colonists
Explanation:
The correct answer would be, United States vs. Jones.
In United States vs. Jones, the US Supreme Court found that government had physically occupied private property via a GPS device over a prolonged period of time.
Explanation:
GPS stands for Global Position System. This is basically a navigation system, which keeps track of the device location and can monitor the movement of the thing on which the device is installed, like mobile phones, cars, bikes, etc.
United States vs. Jones was a landmark United States court case. According to this case, the GPS device which is installed on a vehicle basically constitutes a search under fourth amendment, as it tracks the movement of the vehicle.
Learn more about Global Positioning System at:
brainly.com/question/2975558
#LearnWithBrainly
lol, u just copied someone's answer
anyway, banks can change the savings stored in banks and make them have a greater interest. Banks are also able to loan money, which becomes an exchange with the public as we need to repay the loans banks give us.
:)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Answer:
Reasons for irrational behaviour : Political brand name establishment in favour of candidate, enhancing brand loyalty towards.
More knowledgable public : Would value candidate working on real development, rather than mere brand name.
Explanation:
Political elections are determined by the public's impressions of the candidates rather than the candidates' views on the issues.
Reason(s) of such irrational voting behaviour could be : The candidate having established a personal brand image of himself/ herself, specially in a particular community group. This makes the people of the community being 'brand loyal' towards their candidate, irrespective of his or her ideologies. It is also possible to make that political personality (candidate) an important part of 'national image' or 'community leader image', which reinforce support for the candidate, irrespective of person perception and attitudes.
If public were more knowledgeable about factors that affect person perception and attitudes : The political support would not be based on lineaged political brand names. It would rather be earned on the basis of candidate's performance for socio - economic, political upliftment. This would give power in the hands of deserving politicians & create a message that 'real work' & not just 'name' is needed to gain political success
