Looking at this in terms of sets, let's call O the set of all owls, and F the set of all things that can fly. What this original statement is saying every animal that's a member of the set of all owls is also a member of the set of all things that can fly, or in other words, O⊂F (O is a subset of F). Negating this tells us that, while there's <em>at least one</em> element of O that also belongs to F, O is not contained entirely in F (O⊆F, in notation), so a good negation or our original statement might be:
<em>Not all owls can fly.</em>
Answer: see what you gotta do is/right/left/up/turn left/ down/up/down/down/ right up/ 2nd row turn left/ then do it all over again in you got it
Step-by-step explanation:
/right/left/up/turn left/ down/up/down/down/ right up/ ALSO CAN I BRAINLIEST IF I HELPED.
1 1/2 I think is the answer
