This argument is based on <span>The linguistic relativity hypothesis
According to </span><span>The linguistic relativity hypothesis, the language that people use in our day to day life will heavily influence the view/cognition of the speaker.
For example, if a person tend to use high-energy language, that person will be more likely to feel optimistic in facing the problem in front of him/her</span>
Yes, Like most strategic bombing during World War II, the aim of the air offensive against Japan was to destroy the enemy's war industries, kill or disable civilian employees of these industries, and undermine civilian morale. If a means is justified by an end, the use of the atomic bomb was justified for it brought Japan to her knees and ended the horrible war. If the war had gone longer, without the use of the atomic bomb, how many thousands and thousands of helpless men, women and children would have needlessly died and suffered ...?
Hope this helps ❤❤
It depends. If the museum is famous and popular then there could be more than 100 people there. If the museum is small and unknown, then there could be very small groups. I didn't really understand your question but I hope this helps!
Before farming, people hunted animals and gathered plants (such as berries) for food: they're called hunter-gatherers.
They lived in whatever provided shelter: caves were a good candidate, but also huts made from whatver was available (mud, bamboo, wood, etc.).
