The potential risks that these three groups fall into the same category is that it is a low percentage and it is not a realistic proposition.
According to the theory of 50, 20, 30, a person's salary should be divided into 3 buckets that are:
- 50% of salary must go towards mandatory expenses (housing rent payments, utilities, medical care, basic food, and transportation).
- 20% of the salary must be used for savings and debt payments (programmed savings for old age or a special event, or the payment of debts such as card payments, bank loans, among others).
- 30% of the salary must be allocated for non-priority expenses (it is the expenditure of money on experiences, objects, or others that are not essential for the individual).
This income distribution is unrealistic because most people spend more than 50% of their salary on compulsory expenses, reducing their economic capacity for other purposes.
In this way, the 20% destined to savings and payment of debts would be a minimum amount of the salary, which could have serious consequences such as:
- Inability to pay debts
- Inability to save for the future
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/12198015
Answer:
The question is incomplete since we are not told if the capital gain is a short or long term gain. So I will answer the question in both possible scenarios.
Short term capital gains:
They are taxed as ordinary income, so the net gain = $35,000 - $7,000 = $28,000
Net gain after taxes = $28,000 x (1 - 53.31%) = $13,073.20
Long term capital gains:
They are taxed at a much lower rate that ranges from 0 to 20%. In this case, Christopher is probably taxed at 20%.
Net gain after taxes = $28,000 x (1 - 20%) = $22,400
Explanation:
Answer:
b) third-degree price discrimination.
Explanation:
The price gouging happens on prices when is carried out by the seller, goods, services or goods to a higher level than what is considered acceptable or fair and potentially considered unethically. This usually occurs after a demand or supply shock. Common examples include price increases for basic needs after hurricanes or other natural disasters.
First-degree discrimination (perfect price discrimination) appears when a business charges the maximum possible price for each unit consumed because prices are diverse among some units. In this case, where a company charges a different price for every good or service sold.
Second-degree price discrimination is the concept in which a company charges a different price when there are demands for different quantities consumed, such as quantity discounts on bulk purchases.
Third-degree price discrimination is the case in which a company charges a different price to different consumer groups. This is the type of most common type of price discrimination. If we see in the question there is given distinctive ticket price offers to senior citizens and/or students. That’s why we should choose third-degree price discrimination.
Answer:
96%
Explanation:
Value of the home: $412,000-Down Payment $16,480 = $395,520
Formula for LTV(Loan to Value Ratio): Loan Amount / Appraised Property Value
LTV: $395,520/$412,000 = 0.96 or 96%
Answer:
4,000 units
Explanation:
Given that
Sales volume = 60,000 units
Budgeted production = 54,000 units
Beginning finished goods = 10,000 units
The computation of units for ending finished goods inventory is computed below:-
Budgeted production = Ending finished goods + Sales volume - Beginning finished goods
54,000 = Ending finished goods + 60,000 - 10,000
54,000 = Ending finished goods + 50,000
= 4,000 units
