Answer:
A. Debiting Cost of Goods Sold $7,000
Explanation:
The LIFO is a method used to account value for inventory. Under the method, the last item of inventory purchased is the first one sold.
At year-end, the perpetual inventory records of Anderson Co. indicate 60 units of a particular product in inventory, but a physical inventory taken at year-end indicates only 50 units of this product actually are on hand. So 10 units of the product was shrinkage.
The company should debit Cost of Goods Sold to record this inventory shrinkage.
Anderson Co. use LIFO method, the amount shrinkage product:
10 x $700 = $7,000
C. Whether the deductible is higher compared to other policies. Sorry if I am wrong but this is my best answer.
Answer:
the destruction of jobs due to labor skills of certain workers becoming obsolete.
Explanation:
Social costs in economic thinking are the amount of the personal costs accrued as a component of an activity as well as the expenses levied on customers as a function of becoming subject to the activity in which they are not paid. That is the sum of private and institutional expenses, in other terms.
Due to economic growth, demand has been rising for commodities leading to technology improvements which further leads to lower demands for labor and joblessness. However, majority of the economists states that technological improvement only enhances employment opportunities and joblessness occurs for a temporary period.
Answer:
a. 5.18%;
b. 10.12%;
c. 6.32%;
d. 9.22%.
Explanation:
We apply the formula of Annual rate of return to calculate for the four cases.
The formula for calculating annual rate of return as below:
Annual rate of return = ![\sqrt[year]{Ending value/Beginning value}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%5Byear%5D%7BEnding%20value%2FBeginning%20value%7D)
-1 ;
So, for each of the case given, by applying the formula, the detailed calculations for each case will be:
+ For case a :
![\sqrt[12]{769.5/420} -1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%5B12%5D%7B769.5%2F420%7D%20-1)
= 5.18%;
+ For case b:
![\sqrt[14]{11,567.45/3,000} -1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%5B14%5D%7B11%2C567.45%2F3%2C000%7D%20-1)
= 10.12%;
+ For case c:
![\sqrt[20]{110,000/32,303.47} -1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%5B20%5D%7B110%2C000%2F32%2C303.47%7D%20-1)
= 6.32%;
+ For case d:
![\sqrt[40]{1,100,000/32,275.63} -1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%5B40%5D%7B1%2C100%2C000%2F32%2C275.63%7D%20-1)
= 9.22%.
Home loan amount = $165,000
Estimated closing costs = $6,187.50
% of estimated closing cost = ?
$165,000 * x% = $6,187.50
x% = $6,187.50 ÷ $165,000
x% = 0.0375
x = 0.0375 x 100 = 3.75
Therefore, estimated closing costs = 3.75% of loan amount = 3.75% of $165,000
Actual closing costs = 3.5% of loan amount = 3.5% of $165,000 = $5775
Difference in estimated and actual closing cost percent = 3.75% - 3.5% = 0.25%
The closing costs were lower than the estimate by 0.25%
