If a policy change causes a Pareto improvement, is the outcome necessarily Pareto efficient if a policy change causes a Pareto improvement, then the outcome is not necessarily Pareto efficient this is because another change in the policy could cause another Pareto improvement.
A Pareto development is a development of a device whilst an alternative in the allocation of goods harms no person and advantages as a minimum one character. Pareto enhancements also are called "no-brainers" and are generally predicted to be rare, due to the plain and effective incentive to make any available Pareto development.
Factors that lie within the PPF display an inefficient or below-usage of resources – this is Pareto inefficient. A Pareto development way that output of both products can increase as we move from inside the PPF to factors at the PPF boundary.
Learn more about Pareto here:
brainly.com/question/7304310
#SPJ4
Answer:
I think it's #4 participating in a bank run, because loaning money u give money away but they still have to give that money back by paying the loan little by little.
Explanation:
Answer:
The beginning balance in accounts receivable was: $47,500
Explanation:
Sales reported on the income statement were $385,500, Accounts receivable increased of $385,500 during the period.
Sales, adjusted to a cash basis using the direct method on the statement of cash flows, were $359,000. The company collected $359,000 from the sales. Accounts receivable decreased of $359,000 during the period.
The beginning balance in accounts receivable = The ending balance of accounts receivable + Accounts receivable decreased during the period - Accounts receivable increased during the period = $74,000 + $359,000 - $385,500 = $47,500
