The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Do you consider Bishop Eusebius’s account to be reliable?
No, really not.
The reason why because his account had created many controversies.
Eusebius has been known as the official historian of the church. He participated in the Council of Nice in 314, organized by Roman Emperor Constantine to revise the religious or historic documents that would end up being in the Bible.
So Eusebius based most of his comments on personal opinions and other historic document's interpretations. It is difficult to say that he did the proper research and had reliable sources. During the Nicea Council, a group of Bishops decided what documents had to be part of the Bible and which not, based on their own criteria. That is not a good indicator of the validity of the documents included, even less we can consider those as sacred.
Answer:
The correct option is B, the profits of copper produces increase
Explanation:
Assuming copper is price inelastic, meaning the rise in price would not impact the quantity demanded significantly, the revenue of the suppliers increase and as a result the bottom-line( profits) recorded by the suppliers increase.
A price increase cannot bring about reduction in quantity supplied ads increase in price is an incentive to supply more, hence option A is wrong.
Option C is totally out of context as well as option D
The government is not the one producing the copper let alone increase the content of the copper
Answer/ Explanation:
People of India were emerging from the status of subjects to that of citizens. The country was formed after a partition on the basis of religious differences. It was a traumatic experience for the people of India and Pakistan.
Our constitution members already know the basic needs and nature of our country. 2.Being under the British we already know the working of the political institutes. 3.In 1928, Motilal neheru and 8 other congeres members had already drafted a constitution for our nation.
