What might be the consequences if citizens were not required to serve on a jury?

1 answer:

5 0

If the citizens were not required to serve on jury, we had to rely solely on government decision to establish the law.
This actually had a lot of negative outcomes. Such as the people could no longer held the power in lawmaking process which cause government could do whatever they like.

You might be interested in

In the 1920's 80% of Americans

oee [108]

Invested in the stock market

5 0

4 years ago

Which organization did samuel adams revive after the boston massacre?

yawa3891 [41]

After the Boston massacre, The Boston Committee of Correspondence was revived. <span />

3 0

3 years ago

How did commodore perry's actions in Japan represent a change in U.S. foreign policy

Natali [406]

<span>The arrival of Perry was both a blessing and a curse. Japan had been isolationist for a lengthy period of time and marooned sailors who washed up on the shores of Japan were often mistreated and seen as 'invaders'. Russia and the United States were in a competition for trade in the Pacific and Perry's arrival meant that the United States was seeking better treatment of marooned mariners and use of port facilities. This caused Japan to become more engaged and engaging in international commerce, gave the United States a foothold in a new trade relationship and caused Japan to find the need to modernize, economically, politically and culturally.</span>

3 0

3 years ago

If one angle of the triangle is 105° what are the other two angles?

raketka [301]

Answer:"37.5" , Would be my best guess.

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How did Romulus Augustulus affect the Roman Empire during his reign? (1 point)

yan [13]

Answer:C.) He helped usher in a new era of Christianity in Rome.