The engagement style emphasizes a verbally direct and emotionally expressive method of handling the war. This style views extreme verbal and nonverbal expressions of emotion as demonstrating a willingness to resolve the battle.
Combining these procedures consequences in 4 cross-cultural struggle styles: discussion, engagement, lodging and dynamic.
Expressive war: warfare that makes a speciality of troubles about the best of the connection and managing interpersonal tension and hostility. Instrumental conflict. war that facilities on accomplishing a selected purpose or undertaking and much less on relational troubles.
Learn more about intercultural conflict style here
brainly.com/question/10072600
#SPJ4
Answer:
protect civil liberties through a constitutional system
Explanation:
Civil liberties relates to the guarantees and liberty which liberal governments commit not to abrogate without due process, either through legislation or judicial interpretation.
Civil liberties involves the right of ownership, the right to self-defense and the right of dignity of the body. There are variations between positive freedom / categorical imperatives and adverse freedom / negative rights inside the disparities between civil liberties as well as other forms of freedom.
Thus, from the above we can conclude that the ultimate goal of the founders was to protect these civil liberties.
Polymorphism allows a function or operator to perform different tasks depending on the types of the arguments or operands. Polymorphism is the use of a single symbol to represent many different kinds, or the provision of a single interface to entities of different types, in programming language theory and type theory.
The idea is to operator derived from a biological theory that states that an organism or species can go through a variety of shapes or stages. The 1960s saw a substantial increase in interest in polymorphic type systems, and by the end of the decade, actual implementations were starting to surface.
To learn more about operator, click here.
brainly.com/question/18301011
#SPJ4
I do not know exactly what answer you are looking for here considering the fact that there are many differences between the actions of animals and humans. The best answer I would give is that people have a sense of what is wrong and right and decide based on a moral subconscious. Animals act on they need to survive and do not care about acting civilized or what is right and wrong.
<span> Pizarro seized the Inca emperor,Atahualpa,massacred the senior Inca nobility,extracted a huge ransom in gold and silver for Atahualpa,then murdered him.Pizarro then went on to conquer an effectively leaderless Inca empire.
Much the same with Cortes and the Aztecs - initially pretending to be friendly,Cortes seized the Aztec emperor,extracted a huge ransom for him before murdering him and,although forced to retreat shortly after by superior numbers,soon returned with Mexican native allies to destroy the Aztec empire and conquer it for Spain.
Cortes' conquest was much harder fought than that of Pizarro,but basically their interaction with the natives was the same - kidnap th leader,extort a ransom,kill the hostage anyway,then attack and conquer their people.</span>
