Is it possible to avoid it? Yes I believe so for certain well developed countries with many resources.
For smaller, underdeveloped countries it would prove possible if population willing to go without the certain product or service. If they have never had it they won't miss it.
That question has many factors to consider.
Answer:
The correct answer is d) No, we will eventually pay the environmental costs of producing food in this way.
Explanation:
Even though pesticides and fertilizers have a positive impact on farming productivity, it comes with an environmental cost. Pesticides contaminate water, soil and other vegetation, while fertilizers heavily pollutes groundwater, mainly. Also, irrigation techniques alter the natural conditions of rivers and soil. This is not a problem only in poor countries, but in rich countries as well, and it is a hidden cost that next generations will have to bear.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
It's 15.00 because that's where they all intersect, and it's the 3rd point in <em>S </em>and <em>D</em>. I'd say this is the equilibrium because (15,10) occurs in every value, but maybe take this with a grain of salt since I'm kind of bad at graphs.
A patriarch is a man who rules the family - the correct answer is option b.
If a woman rules the family, she is called a matriarch.
The system in which the man rule the family is called Patriarchy and the system in which women rule the family is called Matriarchy.
Claim: The United States of America needs political parties in the country to maintain a sense of division among its citizens.
Evidence:
-not everyone has the same opinions, this division will always exist, this way it is more orderly
- having political parties is a good way to separate our candidates for elections
- political parties establish a sense of common ground within citizens who share the same beliefs/morals/etc
hope this helped; mark Brainly please