I’m pretty sure the answer to your question is a
$504000 is the actual return
<u>Explanation:</u>
particulars calculation Amount
Service cost 700000
Interest cost 
480000
Less: Expected return 
576000
Prior service cost 48000
Net loss 30000
Pension expense 682000
Therefore, the pension expense is $682000
<u>The computation is as follows for the calculation of return (in $000’s)
</u>
<u>Plan assets
</u>
Beginning = $5760
Actual return = ?
Cash contributions = 696
Less: Retireee benefits = (624)
Ending balance = $6336
Thus after solving this, we get the actual return that is equal to = $504,000
Event by event so you know the schedule
Answer: Because the issuer official no longer holds elected office, the contribution limits of Rule G-37 do not apply.
Explanation:
Rule G-37 is a way to ensure that Municipal Issuers are not unduly influenced by those who donated to their campaigns to get into a position to become Municipal Issuers.
It prohibites for 2 years, Municipal Finance Professionals (MFP) amongst others from engaging in municipal securities business with a Municipal issuer.
An exception however, is that if the MFP is entitled to a vote for the Official in question, they can donate no more than $250 per election.
Seeing as the Municipal Issuer Officer has lost her position, the MFP need not worry about this $250 limit as it no longer applies to her. The MFP is free to donate $500 to the "clean-up" campaign.
Answer:
competition
Explanation:
team members be competing against each other
