If you are rich, you own the means to make more money. Your son will then take over from you, and the class structure will remain intact. Likewise, if you are poor, you can only afford to work in a factory, you cannot pay for a good education for your child, they'll end up working in a factory to survive. The class structure remains the same, each generation of rich people will exploit every generation of poor people. That was also why Marx thought the workers must unite and take control of the means of production, so that they would not be exploited.
it is the person analysis
reason-
a person analysis is the analysis in whch we study the behaviour of the employees it helps us to identify the employees who lacks skills or need training.
When the intervention rises the price stage of goods, then the incentive to supply extra desires increases and consequently growing manufacturers' surplus. So policy market can motivate both client and producer surplus.
A tax causes consumer surplus and producer surplus (earnings) to fall.. some of those losses are captured inside the tax, however, there may be a loss captured with the aid of no celebration—the value of the devices that could be exchanged had been there no tax. those lost gains from trade are called deadweight losses.
For each monetary transaction, there can be both producer surplus (or profit) and client surplus. The mixture–or blended–a surplus is called the economic surplus.
Learn more about policy market here: brainly.com/question/25754149
#SPJ4
Answer:
$5
Explanation:
The computation of Alice's consumer surplus is shown below:
Consumer surplus = Willing to spend - Market price after considering the discount
where
Willing to spend = $30
Market price equals to
= Purchase a pair of jeans - coupon rate
= $35 - $10
= $25
So, the consumer surplus is equal to
= $30 - $25
= $5
Answer:
long run, productive resources
