option d. is the right option
Answer:
C
Explanation:
FDIC gives insurance to depositors. it promises to pay back a certain amount of the deposits of a banks customers in the case where a bank fails. As a result of this insurance banks have a greater incentive to take on more risky projects because they know that their customers would be protected even the project goes sour and the bank fails.
Due to the services of the FDIC, less depositors have lost money when a bank fails because of the insurance services they provide to depositors.
<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
The implicit cost of capital
Implicit cost of capital is the opportunity cost of capital which is already incurred but not reported as a separate cost/expense, Implicit cost is the cost which results from using an existing asset instead of selling or renting it.
For example when a businessman uses his/her existing land which has implicit cost of say $1000 per month but bought it for say $100 many years ago, so $1000 is its implicit cost/current market rent per month which is equal to its oppo
Non-price competition in a monopolistic-ally competitive market is Andy experiencing
Explanation:
The profitability of non-prices applies to the attempts of a dominant corporation to raise its sales and profits by variating goods and production rates instead of lowering the product prices.
Either by modifying the physical attributes or through changes to advertising schemes, a dominant rival may always change his goods.
Varying inventory and distribution prices reduce the company's demand curve and increase production costs.
As a consequence, there will also be a change in the amount of income the organization will gain from extracting the volume of the commodity that equates the MR to MC.
Given:
<span>Fact 1: During contract negotiations, BB’s sales representative promised that the system was “A-1” and “perfect.”
</span><span>Fact 2: The written contract, which the parties later signed, disclaimed all warranties, express and implied.
</span><span>Fact 3: After installation the computer produced only random numbers and letters, rather than the desired accounting information
The express warranty is given in Fact 1 where the Sales Rep promised that the system was "A-1" and "perfect". There is a breach in express warranty here IF the written contract also expresses the same promises.
However, the written contract </span>disclaimed all warranties, express and implied. AND BOTH PARTIES SIGNED THIS CONTRACT. It implies that the buyer has read through the contract and has agreed with what is written in the contract. Thus, they can't file a suit against BB for breaching an express warranty since the written and signed contract has already disclaimed all warranties.
