The correct answer is e. actually helped the new Republican party.
Following the canning, rallies were held in support of Sumner and his speech was sold in over a million copies.
Historian William Gienapp wrote in 1979 that "assault was of critical importance in transforming the struggling Republican party into a major political force."
Answer:
see below.
Explanation:
Mikhail Gorbachev changed the course of the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe in multiple ways. His major policy change was the "Perestroika" reforms (which translates to English as restructuring) and these reforms included a policy of "Glasnost" which means openness. Glasnost allowed for the creation of multiple opposition newspapers, magazines and news broadcast that openly criticized the government, as well as bringing the right of freedom of criticism to the people. Secondly in this Perestroika reforms came " khozraschyot" or "Commercalizeation", which was a limited expansion of free-market business reforms that allowed some people to privately own their own businesses. This was a major change as the basis for the Soviet Union was a socialist economy where the means of production were commonly owned. The third and final change was the opening of relations with the United States and Western Europe. Mikhail Gorbachev sought to end the cold war by standing down large amounts of the military, as well as meeting with President Ronald Reagan.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You forgot to include the choices of the questions. Without the choices, we do not have references. However, hope we can help with the following comments.
Jus ad bellum is the kind of legislation that authorizes the transition from a state of peace and agreement to a state of war, where the use of the armed forces is justified. It implies that just a legitimate authority can wage war when no other option is left. Just ad bellum have some principles, that include: right authority, right intention, proportionality, reasonable hope, and last intention, which can be understood as the case in which war is the last resource after a long period of diplomacy and negotiation, under the right authority and the valid reasons to proceed as the last resource to solve an issue.
