Answer:
That statement is found in the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, part of the Bill of Rights.
Explanation:
The Amendment states that the accused of a crime shall have the right to a speedy trial by an impartial jury of the State and district where the crimes were committed. The accused also have the right to be informed of whatever the charges are, be confronted with the witnesses against him and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.
I hope this answer helps you.
Answer:
Those who defend the use of animals in research contend that nonhuman animals are enough like humans to make them scientifically adequate models of humans, but different enough to make it morally acceptable to experiment on them. In addition to the ethical objections to causing suffering to other sentient species, inherent issues with animal models including differences from humans in both size and physiology, genetic differences, and variations in biological targets limit the ability of data collected from an animal model to be translated to people.
<h2>
HOPE I HELP U</h2>
Desk will be far from each other you would need lots of hand sanitizer and their will be new rules hanged up on walls education will not be affected hard because you probably would not have time to talk about that but you will definitely have new rules
Answer:
if I were juror in murder case, the I would conduct all the scientific evidence, and if it still conflicts with ALL the witnesses I would not believe the witnesses. but I still would not announce my decision. I would want more evidences and proofs to announce my decision because I just can't rely only on scientific evidence, (what if the person who murdered changed the fingerprints and other scientific evidence, you never know)
