1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Y_Kistochka [10]
3 years ago
9

The Egg-Centric Newspaper publishes an article about Professor F.S.T. Amendment, a distinguished constitutional law professor at

a local university. The article indicates how renowned he is in his field and discusses his consulting business with the local newspapers. In passing, it truthfully mentions that he worked his way through law school at a local strip-joint. The professor could sue for which tort?
Law
1 answer:
aivan3 [116]3 years ago
7 0
The professor can’t sue.
You might be interested in
Why did the chicken cross the road?? ;)
Afina-wow [57]

Answer:

to get to the other side!!!

4 0
3 years ago
A state's legislative branch?
Ket [755]

Answer:

hold power with the upper house legislative

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What do you think the legal system should look like? If you could change it in any way? What you would you change?
Marizza181 [45]

Answer:

i

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
How do the two meanings of jurisdiction work in the US legal system?
o-na [289]

Answer:

A. One meaning relates to the US supreme court, and the other meaning points to where each circuit court resides.

Explanation:

Just took quiz on edg

7 0
3 years ago
Hazirah has lent her money amounting to RM30,000 to her classmate, Intan. Intan has promised to pay her debt to Hazirah. Johan,
gulaghasi [49]

Hazirah can legally claim the remaining balance of Intan's debt because there was no acceptance of the offer from Johan that the part-payment should serve as full settlement.

<h3>What is the law of contract?</h3>

The law of contract deals with the enforcement of promises when certain elements are present. These contract elements include offer, acceptance, consideration, and intention.

Intan should remember that a valid and enforceable contract has conditions.  We cannot claim there is an implied acceptance of Johan's offer.  Johan cannot modify the contract terms between Intan and Hazirah because he was not a party to the contract.

Lastly, Johan did not offer any consideration for Hazirah to forfeit the balance of RM5,000.  And Hazirah remained silent during Johan's informal negotiations without communicating her acceptance.

Thus, there was <u>no </u><u>contract</u><u> </u>between Johan and Hazirah, and Intan should do well to repay the balance.

Learn more  about the elements of a contract at brainly.com/question/8116487

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Possible outcomes when senators vote?
    5·1 answer
  • What does securing the crime scene involve?
    5·1 answer
  • In which of the following circumstances, under the doctrine of stare decisis, does the common law rule stated in an earlier judg
    13·1 answer
  • Scarcity and Opportunity Cost: Tutorial
    11·2 answers
  • Do you think that the members of Congress understand the issues that the average American faces? Explain why or why not.
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following is a litigant in a criminal trial?
    7·1 answer
  • I found a website that is a offbrand of this website, and keeps on sending me images of girls off from dating sites, what should
    7·1 answer
  • The Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) was founded in North Carolina at Shaw University. The SNCC is an example o
    6·1 answer
  • In a criminal court case, who recommends a sentence to the judge?
    10·1 answer
  • How can people demonstrate their understanding of the responsibilities duties and obligations of citizenship
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!