The conclusion which comports with the current rights of prisoners held captive as part of the United States War on Terrorism is that the prisoners have rights in humane treatment, medical care and a return to their countries. The right of every prisoner of war is protected by The Third Geneva Convention.
<h3>The Third Geneva Convention</h3>
The protection of the prisoners of war is defined by this convention which defines their rights and sets out the rules of the treatment and release. It is prohibited to perform any unlawful act causing death or endangering the health of the prisoners of war.
#SPJ4
Answer:
What dose pamumuhay mean?
Explanation:
No, it is false that the Patriots achieved a clear victory at the Battle of Monmouth by soundly defeating the British forces, since in fact this battle was inconclusive.
Answer:
See explanation
Explanation:
(Note: This answer is subjective)
In comparing the motives of the crusades to the motives of the Unites States' foreign policy in the Middle East today, you could say the motivations are similar if you hold the belief that the crusades were motivated not just by religious zeal, but by a desire for cultural and regional hegemony that would lead to economic gain. In terms of tactics, further going off the idea that the crusades were motivated by more than simple piety, a parallel can be drawn between the crusades and the US's involvement in the MidEast through their use of a moral belief, in the case of the crusades the need to spread Catholocism, in the case of the US's involvement in the Middle East the need to spread democracy, to disguise a more "nefarious" motive, like a desire for cultural/regional hegemony or economic gain.