In <em>Mapp v. Ohio</em>, the Supreme Court ruled <u>B. If the police</u> violate the law to obtain evidence, they cannot use that evidence against an accused person in court.
<h3>What was the place of evidence in the case of Mapp v. Ohio?</h3>
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the state in a 5-3 vote, favoring Mapp, from whom evidence was obtained without due process.
The implication is that evidence seized unlawfully from a suspect or an accused, without a search warrant, could not be used in criminal prosecutions in state courts.
Thus, in <em>Mapp v. Ohio</em>, the Supreme Court ruled <u>B. If the police</u> violate the law to obtain evidence, they cannot use that evidence against an accused person in court.
Learn more about the importance of evidence in criminal prosecutions at brainly.com/question/7802791
#SPJ1
Hi there!
The answer to your question is FALSE. At the Battle of the Alamo, the American's lost.
Could you please Brainliest me?
The correct answer is letter D
Explanation: The Islamic world has a rich artistic tradition of creating highly geometric and symmetrical ornaments. The process of creating Islamic tiles has improved over the centuries. The Palaces of the Alhambra in Granada and Alcazar in Seville, as well as the great Mosque of Cordoba in Spain are examples of the wide variety of geometric patterns on their floors, walls and ceilings.
Answer:
to kill certain types of microbes, such as Cryptosporidium, norovirus, and Clostridium difficile 1-5. While alcohol-based hand sanitizers can inactivate many types of microbes very effectively when used correctly, 1-15 people may not use enough of the disinfectant, or may remove the product before they drying is complete 14.
Explanation:
