1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
xxMikexx [17]
3 years ago
12

What lessons did future U.S. leaders learn from the 1974 U.S. Supreme Court case United States v. Nixon? 1)The president is acco

untable for obeying the law, 2)The president is responsible for enforcing the law, 3) The president is not allowed to hold secert talks with foreign governments, 4) The president is not allowed to have private meetings with cabinet members.​
History
2 answers:
BartSMP [9]3 years ago
7 0

The correct answer is: The president is accountable for obeying the law

US v. Nixon stands for the rule that the President is responsible for obeying the law of the land.

nadezda [96]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: 1

Explanation:

1)The president is responsible for obeying the law

You might be interested in
Take a look at these major themes of world history: 1. interaction between humans and the environment 2. development and interac
Alex
2. development and interactions of cultures should be correct. Hope this helps!
5 0
3 years ago
Vietnam had been a colony controlled by what nation prior to World War Il?
Phoenix [80]
France controlled them before WWII
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What do John Carver and William Bradford have in common? A. They established Massachusetts Bay Colony. B. They were pastors in t
GREYUIT [131]
Both John Carver and William Bradford C. <span>Each were governors of the Plymouth colony.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain why imperial mother countries would make a profit by selling colonists manufactured goods
Effectus [21]
I think it is <span>In the colonies, mercantilisim was used in order for England/Great Britian to gain wealth from trade that wasn't within the mother country. </span>
8 0
3 years ago
One way Diocletian brought short-term order to Rome involved
miskamm [114]
One way Diocletian brought short-term order to Rome was to "divide the empire" into to distinct spheres--in the hope that this would make it easier to manage. 
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was the listeners background knowledge of mlk 'I had a dream' speech?
    15·1 answer
  • Which nation was Spain’s main rival for wealth and power in the 1400s?
    12·2 answers
  • What two new parties filled the gap left by the death of the Whigs in the 1850s?
    15·1 answer
  • What are 3 differences and 3 similarities between the American Revolution and the French Revolution.
    14·1 answer
  • Question 8
    9·1 answer
  • which part of a historical essay is used to make a reader interested in the essays topic and summarize its key ideas​
    13·1 answer
  • Hehe! Fun fact the Mona Lisa has no eyebrows!
    5·1 answer
  • What did Hatshepsut do after her first two obelisks were completed?
    12·1 answer
  • Which of these did the Soviet Union do in 1961?
    5·1 answer
  • Assess the impact of hunting and gathering on early Shona communities in Zimbabwe
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!