Can someone answer quickly

You purchased a stock on Monday for $24 per share. 1. On Tuesday, the stock price was $36 per share. What was the percent increa

Otrada [13]

#1

36 - 24 = 12

12/24x100 = 50%

It was increased 50%

#2

Tuesday stock price was $36, decrease 50%

New price would be 36/2 = $18

7 0

3 years ago

(3,5) and (9,9) in point slope

Sophie [7]

The point slope form is

Y=mx+b

y=2/3x+3

the slope is 2/3

5 0

3 years ago

I don't understand this question but the company I choose was PepsiCo. The shares price is $146.02

Anni [7]

9514 1404 393

Answer:

136.96754 shares, or maybe 136 shares

Step-by-step explanation:

At a cost of $146.02 per share, $20,000 will buy ...

$20,000 / (146.02/share) = 136.96754 shares

__

Some accounts will let you purchase partial shares; others require you purchase whole shares. $20,000 is enough to pay for 136.96754 shares, but you may be able to purchase only 136 shares. (You would have $141.28 in cash remaining after that transaction.)

Some accounts manage shares in multiples of 0.001 shares; others may use more decimal places. Above, we have shown the quantity that spends the entire $20,000. Using fewer decimal places will leave some cash remaining.

We have assumed you're not paying any brokerage fees or loads that would reduce the amount of money that actually purchases shares.

_____

<em>Additional comment</em>

Whenever you buy anything, the cost of more than one of it is the unit price times the number of units. (Quantity discounts may apply.) In like fashion, the cost of multiple shares of stock is the single-share cost multiplied by the number of shares. As with all multiplication relations, a corresponding division relation is <em>the number of shares is the total cost divided by the cost per share</em>.

8 0

3 years ago

This extreme value problem has a solution with both a maximum value and a minimum value. Use Lagrange multipliers to find the ex

ANTONII [103]

Answer:

Maximum value: $3* \sqrt{n}$

Minimum value: $-3* \sqrt{n}$

Step-by-step explanation:

Let $g(x) = x_1^2 + x_2^2+x_3^2+ ----+ x_n^2$ , the restriction function.The Lagrange Multiplier problem states that an extreme (x1, ..., xn) of f with the constraint g(x) = 9 has to follow the following rule:

$\nabla{f}(x_1, ..., x_n) = \lambda \nabla{g} (x_1,...,x_n)$

for a constant $\lambda$ .

Note that the partial derivate of f respect to any variable is 1, and the partial derivate of g respect xi is 2xi, this means that

$1 = \lambda 2 x_1$

Thus,

$x_i = \frac{1}{2\lambda} = c$

Where c is a constant that doesnt depend on i. In other words, there exists c such that (x1, x2, ..., xn) = (c,c, ..., c). Now, since g(x1, ..., xn) = 9, we have that n * c² = 9, or

$c = \, ^+_- \, \sqrt{\frac{9}{n} } = \, ^+_- \frac{3}{\sqrt{n}}$

When c is positive, f reaches a maximum, which is $\frac{3}{\sqrt{n}} + \frac{3}{\sqrt{n}} + \frac{3}{\sqrt{n}} + ..... + \frac{3}{\sqrt{n}} = n * \frac{3}{\sqrt{n}} = 3 * \sqrt{n}$

On the other hand, when c is negative, f reaches a minimum, $-3 * \sqrt{n}$

8 0

4 years ago

What is greater, 5/7 or 4/6?

Veseljchak [2.6K]

5/7 is greater than 4/6 or 2/3

2/3 is 66% or .6 repeated

5/7 is 71.4% or .714285 repeated

therefore 5/7 > 2/3

7 0

3 years ago