Answer:
he added the dimensions of the rectangle. He used the wrong formula. the formula he used was length + breadth. He should have multiplied by 2
6x + 8y +8
Step-by-step explanation:
Perimeter of a rectangle = 2 x (L + B)
L = length
b = breadth
2 (3x + 4y + 4. ) = 6x + 8y +8
Answer: I and III
Step-by-step explanation:
We observe in the case provided that the researcher, who has no interest in the population to intervene, is going to carry out surveys to assess whether the neighborhood is a good place to live, obtaining the following conclusions:
i. The Minneapolis Resident Survey was an observational study.
ii. The Minneapolis Resident Survey was an experiment.
iii. The figure 50.1% is a descriptive statistic for the sample.
iv. The figure 50.1% is a statistical inference for the population.:By estimating the sample, obtained by a lower percentage of the total of the respondents, it is known that with a 95% confidence interval that the rating obtained from the respondents considering that the neighborhood is a good place to live was found between 0.44 and 0.50, taking this interval as a statistical inference for the population.
The correct answer is I and III, since in this study no interventions were made to the population and only one observation of a characteristic of the neighborhood was made and in III we know that the descriptive statistic only describes data and summarizes it, which is a of the ways to display the data from the descriptive survey.
Hi there! The answer is g(x) = 4^x.
The function g(x) is an exponential function, and these functions grow faster than linear or quadratic formulas.
Answer:
3Ax-6x = 15
3x(A-2)=15
If A were 2, the left side of the equation would be 0 and it wouldn't equal 15 no matter what the value of x is. So A is 2
I believe the correct answer should be the second option. This makes the most sense given the coordinates.
If this helped you, please list me as brainliest!
